That makes the hypocrisy of the gun-grabbers all the more glaring. When they resort to demonstrable lies, like “The NRA wants to ban this gun,” and the Bradys amplify the meme with social media posts quoting articles deceptively claiming the goal is to “prevent these guns from ever reaching store shelves,” what’s intentionally left unsaid is that the opposition from gun rights advocates is to mandates. Were edicts like the one in New Jersey, that the Bradys are now suing to have imposed, not threatening to take all choice but theirs away, the “gun lobby” would never seek legislation to prohibit voluntary personalized gun ownership. The legal objections center wholly on gun owner choices being eliminated by diktat. [More]Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes the Brady Campaign doing what it does best: Attempting to have edicts dictating choice-limiting Second Amendment infringements rammed down people’s throats, all backed up by state enforcers with guns, and then accusing us of being against free choice! With “progressives,” every day is Opposite Day. Also see Workman’s take on this development.
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
Brady New Jersey smart gun lawsuit demonstrates hypocrisy, anti-choice agenda
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment