Monday, October 20, 2014

Strict Scrutiny

I don't get why gun owners in Alabama would oppose it. [More]
Posted by David Codrea at 10/20/2014 11:41:00 AM

3 comments:

Backwoods Engineer said...

Thanks for linking to this, David. I'm no-compromise on the RKBA, but people have to understand, it is going to take awhile to get good rulings in the courts (dare I say "the long march through the institutions?").

Strict scrutiny mandates, while not a panacea, are another weapon in our arsenal (hah, take that, MSM) to fight back against the loss of our rights.

10/20/2014 12:08 PM
David Codrea said...

Yeah, I agree SNBI too, but ask 'em if we do it their way, what will the outcome be? Make "Molon Labe!" comments while the antis use the courts to their advantage?

10/20/2014 1:39 PM
Mack said...

The neat trick is to prohibit the courts from declaring "public safety" a "compelling government interest" -- that is because it is a discretionary government service, and there is no right to it. See DeShaney.

10/20/2014 6:43 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)