This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I would like to point out that "Mythbusters" did this years ago....and nearly got in trouble for it.
This was also do on "Sons of Guns" with 12 gauge Saiga shotguns....
What this poor soul does not understand is that even though his "device" is loaded with cap pistols because it "can" mount the real deal the "Device" rube goldberg that it is;
Is a machinegun by it's self under the NFA definition and subject to 10 years in prison, and a 1/4 million dollar fine.
I find that surprising. I would have thought each mounted gun would be a separate and distinct firearm, and each firing would have been accomplished by "a single function of the trigger" as it revolves into position again. I'd appreciate clarification on this along with a cite.
"Any part designed and intended to convert a weapon into a machine gun"
"A combination of parts designed and intended to convert a weapon into a a machine gun"
So yes, under the NFA the contraption sans any other (installed) firearms is a "Machinegun" under the current definition...The video documents the case for DOJ unfortunately.
I believe the gentleman in question isn't worried about a visit because I don't think the boys at the ATFEIEIO have any jurisdiction over a guy living in Upper Franconia Germany.
6 comments:
David,
I would like to point out that "Mythbusters" did this years ago....and nearly got in trouble for it.
This was also do on "Sons of Guns" with 12 gauge Saiga shotguns....
What this poor soul does not understand is that even though his "device" is loaded with cap pistols because it "can" mount the real deal the "Device" rube goldberg that it is;
Is a machinegun by it's self under the NFA definition and subject to 10 years in prison, and a 1/4 million dollar fine.
I wonder if he had a visit yet???
I find that surprising. I would have thought each mounted gun would be a separate and distinct firearm, and each firing would have been accomplished by "a single function of the trigger" as it revolves into position again. I'd appreciate clarification on this along with a cite.
Heh! Looks like a reworking of the Gatling Gun!
good point about each revolver being a separate and distinct firearm, but you know how the BATFEces likes to change the rules to ban more guns.
The NFA 26 U.S.C. Section 5845(b)
"Any part designed and intended to convert a weapon into a machine gun"
"A combination of parts designed and intended to convert a weapon into a a machine gun"
So yes, under the NFA the contraption sans any other (installed) firearms is a "Machinegun" under the current definition...The video documents the case for DOJ unfortunately.
You win.
I believe the gentleman in question isn't worried about a visit because I don't think the boys at the ATFEIEIO have any jurisdiction over a guy living in Upper Franconia Germany.
Post a Comment