Although a RICO case comes close. [More]
You know what? She was with the guy 49 years...? Forget everything else -- she owns half. If he really tried to hide stuff, he's basically set the stage for this.
But expanding things into this arena ought to raise grave concerns. That the 11th Circuit panel "appeared to relish its involvement" tells us much.
[Via Richard Feldman]
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Isn't RICO supposed to be government use only?
https://tollefsenlaw.com/civil-actions-under-rico/
One would think that if the divorce were subject to USA law, she'd get half, and the whiny offspring would be entitled to nothing, none of his money, no birthright guarantee of employment, just nothing.
Post a Comment