This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I would point out that the Ninth Amendment in the Bill of Rights specifically recognizes that there are "rights of the people" that are not enumerated.
A right of "free passage, or unrestricted travel" is not hard to imagine as being such a right of the people, especially when we are burdened with a judicial sphere that proclaims that a right to abortion exists.
Viewed in such a light, a driver's license would necessarily be minimally expensive, shall issue, nationally recognized, and only revoked for cause after due process - which is pretty much the position that prevails if you are prepared to squint a little over the "must pass a test" element.
I would argue that "Jack" and others are NOT having trouble distinguishing between rights and privileges, but between enumerated rights and other rights not enumerated.
In the case of Amendment II, that would be between that which "shall not be infringed" (because that's what it says), and that upon which SOME infringement MIGHT be permissible - seeing as it was not explicitly listed.
Principally, my point is that simply because a right is not enumerated in the Bill of Rights DOES NOT RENDER IT A PRIVILEGE.
3 comments:
Unfortunately, Jack doesn't know the difference between a privilege(driver's license) and a Constitutionally protected right (gun ownership).
Yes, our wonderful "educational system" at work again.....
Elmo:
I would point out that the Ninth Amendment in the Bill of Rights specifically recognizes that there are "rights of the people" that are not enumerated.
A right of "free passage, or unrestricted travel" is not hard to imagine as being such a right of the people, especially when we are burdened with a judicial sphere that proclaims that a right to abortion exists.
Viewed in such a light, a driver's license would necessarily be minimally expensive, shall issue, nationally recognized, and only revoked for cause after due process - which is pretty much the position that prevails if you are prepared to squint a little over the "must pass a test" element.
I would argue that "Jack" and others are NOT having trouble distinguishing between rights and privileges, but between enumerated rights and other rights not enumerated.
In the case of Amendment II, that would be between that which "shall not be infringed" (because that's what it says), and that upon which SOME infringement MIGHT be permissible - seeing as it was not explicitly listed.
Principally, my point is that simply because a right is not enumerated in the Bill of Rights DOES NOT RENDER IT A PRIVILEGE.
Post a Comment