A federal judge in California has ruled that including a small Christian cross on the official seal of Los Angeles County is unconstitutional, siding with civil liberties advocates. [More]My, how very Opposite Day "progressive" of the Bill Clinton appointee.
Me, I object to calling the place "The Angels." That discriminates against those of us who call them spirit guides or Valkyries or Houris, or even those who call them demons...
Matter of fact, the example of the Taliban/Buddhist statue "flap," as adopted by those intent on going after Confederate monuments, makes it clear the entire mission system is emblematic of white privilege, patriarchy, religious bigotry, oppression and genocide, and it offends the hell out of people who live to have the hell offended out of them. If they're not going to be destroyed outright, we at least need to convert some to give equal shrift to Baal and Cthulu, as well as apportion a few as "bathhouses"...
3 comments:
Oh my, then the large statue of Fr. Junipers Serra just of the highway in Palo Alto will have to be taken down. Also, the historic Mission Churches, that date back to the 18th century, will have to cease being state recognized historic buildings.
It never ends, the Marxist/progressives what to erase our Christian heritage. Western civilization is irretrievably entertained with Christianity, so removing all vestiges of Christianity is a part of neo-Bolshevism.
I was looking for the mission building with the cross, and discovered it replaced with a mosque in your illustration. And what about that cow - isn't that a sacred animal to Hindus?
Just think of all the federal judges Obama has been able to pack the courts with in the last seven plus years that are just like this one. Or worse.
Post a Comment