 |
| [More] |
I notice Cato doesn't address that (or answer this) in its curiously timed bit of apples and oranges-mixing "left libertarian" globalist subversion and creative data manipulation. They never will because they know they can't. I hope to be expanding on that within a day or so.
1 comment:
By only examining immigrants and not their "birthright citizen" children, Cato also hides the fact that most of the *remaining* 12% of terrorist attacks were done by the "birthright citizen" *children* of Islamic immigrants. That is also the result of suicidally subversive Left "Libertarian" immigration policy, including deluge immigration of an intolerant, oppressive and aggressive foreign totalitarian ideology & religion that is inimical to Liberty, free markets and human rights. Even "moderate" Islamic immigrants are a vector for the spread of that naturally extremist religion.
There is no way to adequately screen Islamic immigrants, especially refugees. They will of course tell you whatever you want to hear in order to get in. And Islam encourages lying to the infidel.
Even if they could be adequately screened, there is no way to screen what their future *children* will become.
The offspring of "moderate" Muslims often become fundamentalists, sharia promoters, and jihadi sympathizers.
Perfect example: The Orlando jihadi's dad was supposedly the model "moderate" Muslim, an active Democrat apparatchik, all hooked up with politicians from both parties. Showed up right behind Hillary at her fundraiser after the massacre.
Another example: Ft Hood terrorist Major Hasan's Palestinian parents were welcomed in by Nixon. Republicans let Hasan in the military, promoted him and paid for his medical education even after they knew he was a fundamentalist, sharia, jihadi sympathizer.
In a free country, you can't keep the children of 'moderate' Muslims from reading their own scriptures and history, which promote extreme, sadistic, merciless intolerance, oppression, invasion, mass murder, torture, slavery, rape, mutilation, and the worldwide conversion of humanity by the sword. Nor can you keep them from associating with fundamentalists. The only defense consistent with our liberty, culture, security, dignity, and freedom of speech and religion, and the survival of the USA itself, is an abundance of caution, which means keeping Islam out of the USA in the first place to the greatest extent possible.
Tolerance of intolerance is no virtue.
Intolerance of intolerance is no vice.
Yes, the Constitution recognizes the American citizen's right to freedom of religion. If forbids congress from establishing a religion. But that's not a suicide pact. It does not prevent banning Islamic immigration. Banning or severely limiting Islamic immigration does not establish an official state religion. Nor does it infringe the right of the citizen to the religion of her choice. These are rights of citizens, not foreigners. Foreigners have no right to come here. Nor do Muslim-American citizens, multiculti liberals, or Left "Libertarians" have a right to demand unlimited Islamic immigration.
Indeed, defending freedom of religion *requires* us to ban or at least slash Islamic immigration to a nominal trickle. If not, the USA will end up with increasing numbers of Sharia law communities, terror attacks, "honor" killings, "no go" neighborhoods, oppression of women, gays, Jews and Christians, etc. We will face the eventual repeal of the First Amendment and the extreme oppression of all non-Islamic religions, the sorry state of *every* Islamic-majority country.
Post a Comment