This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
UPDATE: The Facebook post with a video of a news story about a gun class for women that this links to has been removed. I changed the link to the Fox 40 report.
12 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Their "instructor" is a retired deputy sheriff -- no wonder she knows nothing about safe gun handling -- she's been "highly trained." Sheesh!
I think most muggers would never suspect that a woman might be packing a pistol. The thugs keep getting more and more brave (or is that just STUPID?) when they pick a target to rob/rape and otherwise assault. Time for more armed women to "thin the herd" of the wild animals that need to be eliminated.
Long ago the sheriff in the county where my mother lived offered a course for ladies, so she went. When asked if they had a weapon, my mother pulled out her .357 mag Ruger revolver. It impressed the deputies that a 70+ yo lady had such iron in her purse. Nothing was said about a lack of permit.
It's always good to have new members in the Pro Second Amendment club, especially in California.
BTW, the classroom in the video is at a gun store/indoor range 10 minutes from my home. They do more than their share to support the cause. The business's name is The Range.
I was there the day this news story was filmed. All the instructors were vigilant about correcting this behavior. The range is an awesome place that offers great classes. It's a shame the news story didn't keep the portion of footage showing the corrective action rather than the blunder. A great class decimated by those who only know a portion of the story.
Very interesting. The linked-to Facebook page with the video has been taken down.
Facebook. Isn't that Jeff Zuckerberg's outfit? Isn't he the guy that supports new restrictive gun laws for the citizens while at the same time having a full time staff of 24 armed security personnel to protect his family? Why on earth would his company take down a video of honest, law abiding citizens attempting to learn how to legally protect themselves with a firearm? That doesn't make any sense, does it?
Well, anon, I didn't want to go there since the intent is not to "decimate," but since you brought it up, there is indeed more than this "portion of the story," and it sounds like you are in a position to help validate or correct some of it.
First, this is not behavior that should need to be corrected -- each individual should be required to demonstrate understanding of and adherence to the rules before being permitted to handle a gun in the classroom. That several did it at the same time is damn near inexcusable for an instructor who knows she is teaching novices. I've not once had a person I was taking shooting for the first time do this because I make sure the rules are emphasized before I allow them to touch my gun, and reinforce it immediately when they pick it up.
Second, if the instructor was on top of things to immediately correct, why am I getting info that some related photos were taken down from the business's Facebookpage, which suggests unawareness by someone associated with them until it was pointed out? Is that information wrong?
All this said, it's great that women are being taught. If this helps make sure they are taught more safely, it should be viewed as a good thing, not as an attack to decimate. None of us out there doing things are -- or should be -- immune to criticism and correction. That we do good is a non sequitur and does not mitigate times we don't do so well.
12 comments:
Their "instructor" is a retired deputy sheriff -- no wonder she knows nothing about safe gun handling -- she's been "highly trained." Sheesh!
I think most muggers would never suspect that a woman might be packing a pistol. The thugs keep getting more and more brave (or is that just STUPID?) when they pick a target to rob/rape and otherwise assault.
Time for more armed women to "thin the herd" of the wild animals that need to be eliminated.
Long ago the sheriff in the county where my mother lived offered a course for ladies, so she went. When asked if they had a weapon, my mother pulled out her .357 mag Ruger revolver. It impressed the deputies that a 70+ yo lady had such iron in her purse. Nothing was said about a lack of permit.
It's always good to have new members in the Pro Second Amendment club, especially in California.
BTW, the classroom in the video is at a gun store/indoor range 10 minutes from my home. They do more than their share to support the cause. The business's name is The Range.
I was there the day this news story was filmed. All the instructors were vigilant about correcting this behavior.
The range is an awesome place that offers great classes. It's a shame the news story didn't keep the portion of footage showing the corrective action rather than the blunder. A great class decimated by those who only know a portion of the story.
Very interesting. The linked-to Facebook page with the video has been taken down.
Facebook. Isn't that Jeff Zuckerberg's outfit? Isn't he the guy that supports new restrictive gun laws for the citizens while at the same time having a full time staff of 24 armed security personnel to protect his family? Why on earth would his company take down a video of honest, law abiding citizens attempting to learn how to legally protect themselves with a firearm? That doesn't make any sense, does it?
Well, anon, I didn't want to go there since the intent is not to "decimate," but since you brought it up, there is indeed more than this "portion of the story," and it sounds like you are in a position to help validate or correct some of it.
First, this is not behavior that should need to be corrected -- each individual should be required to demonstrate understanding of and adherence to the rules before being permitted to handle a gun in the classroom. That several did it at the same time is damn near inexcusable for an instructor who knows she is teaching novices. I've not once had a person I was taking shooting for the first time do this because I make sure the rules are emphasized before I allow them to touch my gun, and reinforce it immediately when they pick it up.
Second, if the instructor was on top of things to immediately correct, why am I getting info that some related photos were taken down from the business's Facebookpage, which suggests unawareness by someone associated with them until it was pointed out? Is that information wrong?
All this said, it's great that women are being taught. If this helps make sure they are taught more safely, it should be viewed as a good thing, not as an attack to decimate. None of us out there doing things are -- or should be -- immune to criticism and correction. That we do good is a non sequitur and does not mitigate times we don't do so well.
What exactly is your connection?
Link is broken.
Elmo, I don't think it was Facebook that took it down.
Then who did?
Apologies. I just read your 9:08 comment. Now I get it.
Safest place in that classroom is in the BACK. Preferably near an exit!
Post a Comment