Calling a handful of isolated anecdotes woven into an attack piece a “study” is the first bit of deception. Presenting those anecdotes and VPC’s conclusion without even attempting to consult someone who might actually know what he’s talking about is a good indication that the “staff reporters” are flacks fraudulently promulgating agenda politics rather than investigating and reporting in a manner consistent with any semblance of ethics or respect for canons of journalism. [More]
That makes them disrespectful of their readers. They’re also lazy. The anecdotal bullet points NJToday lists are lifted word-for-word from the VPC presser.
2 comments:
Cory Booker is just plain nuts, and he could very easily head up the VPC. He'd be a shoo-in.
"A study of the criminal use of suppressors between 1995 and 2005 found only 15 used in crimes – and only two instances of being used in a murder."
- above from: https://bearingarms.com/ba-staff/2017/01/30/disinformation-campaign-on-the-hearing-protection-act-continues/
Going after suppressors is another misguided and hysterical movement by the anti-2nd Amendment crowd.
Post a Comment