This is a case where the NY Times Editorial author James Bennet claimed to be so ignorant, so uninterested in doing any research, and so oblivious to his surroundings, that his ignorance turned into legal bliss. [More]And of course he had an agenda. Still, that a judge ruled The New York Times' fake news is due to incompetence is something to continually remind people of whenever we see it recur.
[Via Michael G]
No comments:
Post a Comment