So What We Need are 'Reasonable Restrictions' and 'Compromise'?

Rallies with guns cannot be treated, for First Amendment purposes, in the same fashion as rallies with no guns. [More]

Why? Because Slate says so?

Slate?

Now the First and Second Amendments are incompatible, so one of them must go? Why not both?

They're getting to that. All the Marxists know how to do is demand obedience enforced through a monopoly of violence.

I've been to plenty of rallies with guns. I've never seen those on the side of the Constitution initiate violence with them.

Charlottesville reflected a deliberate stand-down ordered for political exploitation purposes. Some friends of mine are working up an analysis of that along with a comparison of results where peacekeeping was proactive. I'll be sure to link to that when it's posted.

[Via TheFakePundit]