The International Association of Chiefs of Police has recommended for the last 10 years that weapons confiscated by law enforcement agencies should be destroyed rather than sold or traded because "this action helps to keep officers and residents alike safe from recirculated weapons." [More]Those jackbooted globalist thugs? If that argument holds true, no one but them should have guns.
Oh...
That's what this is really about. The effete author of this exercise in "progressive" bitchiness is an indignant hoplophobe who would also rather taxpayers be on the hook for even more. So s/he tries to make it look like one-sided cronyism instead of a good deal for both sides.
If any outrage should be registered over this it would be if guns were confiscated from otherwise good Americans snared by infringements, if public contracts weren't put out for bid in order to favor partners, or if any stolen property has not been returned to its owner.
[Via cydl]
3 comments:
The supremacists make it clear that they have contempt for their employers -- the citizens.
I guess they are also opposed to transfusions, donations and the like --- no matter who dies as a result.
It appears that the seized property is demonized. They must be destroyed to eradicate their evil, magical properties.
By not disbursing this seized property to the highest bidder at public auction, they are stealing from their citizens.
They need to treat a seized firearm the same way as a seized Buick.
Post a Comment