If the allegations are true, "the officers acted with deliberate indifference to a known and obvious danger" and violated the Trump supporters' constitutional rights," said the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. [More]So that trumps "no duty to protect"?
I've long wondered why deliberate indifference is not raised more often.
[Via Mack H]
1 comment:
I wonder how long it will take the Supremes to overturn this decision?
Post a Comment