Iowa House advances 'constitutional carry' despite warnings it will make state less safe ... But Holt called ... criticism “utterly inaccurate.” Instead, he said, the measure would “absolutely increase background checks. No background checks are eliminated ... or I wouldn’t be supporting it,” he said. [More]
Why not? How are prior restraints "constitutional"?
1 comment:
Sincerity, or just a handy barstool?
Maybe the only suitable response to a bold, in-your-face lie like "Democrats support the Second Amendment" is an equal and opposite whopper.
Post a Comment