Absolutely?

 Mike Lindell says he's got the evidence the election was hacked by the Chicoms and SCOTUS will agree with him "absolutely 9-0." [Watch]

Providing they don't punt without comment again. Because if he's right, the country would explode, and that's the last thing the string-pullers want until they're the ones controlling the demolition.

This was released in early June, and naturally, no one in the DSM or even in the Republican party will touch it, and the "official" judgment is anyone who questions the election results is a nutjob extremist. 

Here's a technical question for those of you who understand Martian, which is what the numbers on this video seem like to me: Is the disguised expert right? (The major flaw I see is that by hiding his identity, we have no way of ascertaining his qualifications and motives, which could be to act as a spoiler from the inside if what he's saying can be debunked.)

Here's a legal question for those of you who understand a more convoluted language: Why wouldn't an attorney for defendants who took the Capitol protest into the building introduce all the documented claims to, if not dismiss the charges, at least mitigate the sentences? Can you imagine if a judge ruled it admissible and it was found to be true?

Not to be a naysayer, but I'm not holding my breath. Time and again we've seen folks like Sydney Powell, Jovan Pulitzer, and the like come forward with Kraken releases and  "bombshell revelations" and the end result is "Where's the beef?"

That's not a criticism of them. It's an observation on how when it comes to the totalitarian-minded, evidence doesn't matter because there are no rules but theirs. 

Say it's all true. What would those behind it not do to keep that from coming out to the general cognizance? And how many of "our countrymen" would be fine with that?

[Via GP]