In her ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Marilyn J. Horan noted, “Although the courts owe ‘substantial deference’ to local zoning decisions, restrictions on rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment…must still satisfy intermediate scrutiny…At this stage and for purposes of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction, the Township has not provided evidence that the challenged Ordinance provisions…in fact serve the asserted government interests of health, safety, and welfare.” [More]
Good for the injunction, but what's the rationale for the First getting strict scrutiny and the Second getting second class treatment? What could be more compelling than "the security of a free State"?
No comments:
Post a Comment