Saturday, January 31, 2009

An appealing development

Attorney Alan Gura has filed an opening brief in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column.

Hey, I had an outpatient surgery yesterday and am doing the pain pill routine--this is probably it for this weekend. I'd prepared this column the day before I went in.

Please spread the word about this new column and please go easy on the emails or I'll be swamped when I'm back up and running.

Thanks.

Friday, January 30, 2009

Gangswell

Criminal gangs in the USA have swelled to an estimated 1 million members responsible for up to 80% of crimes in communities across the nation, according to a gang threat assessment compiled by federal officials. [More]

Say, I've got a swell idea...

Let's disarm you and me...

We're the Only Ones Forgive Us Our Trespasses Enough

A former Teton County Sheriff's deputy who shot a dog three times after its owner had tied it to a tree pleaded guilty Wednesday to misdemeanor trespassing..[More]
I had to dig through a lot of stuff to find the last time I talked about this.

Enter "dog" in the site search box and see for yourself.

I may have to start a category right alongside the "Only Ones" files. Well, not too close to it. We all know how that can end up.

So--what do you think? "Misdemeanor trespassing" for us, too...?

[Via Avg Joe]

Not Close Enough for Government Work?

From thedweeze:
Just heard this on Shep's show (approx 7:40PM): The Army has 'recalled' 16,000 sets of body armor. They were their usual obfuscatory selves about explaining exactly why this particular 16,000 units and what the criteria were. The reason I'm alerting you all is that in all likelihood these things will hit the surplus market late this Spring or early Summer and folks need to be aware of exactly what they're looking at.
OK, here's the story.
[B]ullet-shielding ceramic plates in the armor failed testing...
Seems like it would be a hell of a liability if they released these into the civilian market...

Questioning Rosanna Pulido for Congress?

I've been seeing a growing buzz on this candidate in the gun community. [More]

I also note that replacing Rahm Emanuel with even a nominally pro-gun candidate would be an improvement.

So I don't mean to take out my ongoing disillusionment on her--it's just that I've been wooed by "pro-gun Republicans" before. For decades. And here we are.

So when I see her 2nd Amendment page not only misspells Hale DeMar's name, but doesn't even touch on the core meaning of the right in terms of being a safeguard against tyranny, you'll excuse me if I don't wonder just how deep the well goes. Plus, I gotta tell you--stumping for Chi-Town "Only Ones" doesn't exactly put a Liberty lump in my throat.

Let her unequivocally answer a few questions and I'll be happy to consider her candidacy based on how she does:

1. Do you believe that the Constitution is the "supreme law of the land" and that the Bill of Rights acknowledges the birthrights of all Americans?

2. If so, should these rights be proactively protected from infringement by all levels of government, including city, county and state?

3. Please give some examples of gun laws you consider constitutional.

4. Please give some examples of gun laws you consider unconstitutional.

5. Does the right to bear arms include the right for any peaceable citizen to carry them concealed without a permit, as in Vermont?

6. Do you believe that Americans have a right to own, use and carry weapons of military pattern?

7. Do you support or oppose calls to “enforce existing gun laws”?

8. Do you support or oppose licensing requirements to own or carry firearms? Why?

9. What specific gun laws will you work to get repealed?

10. If elected, will you back your words of support for firearms rights up with consistent actions? How?

[Via John Richardson]

The Whine Club

Vanderboegh has some fun. Content Warning. [More]

An Evening Visit

"Before you take the sword, before you walk the way of the sword, know this", she held back slightly and the heat I felt became somehow instantly cold, lonely, vacuous. "Once taken, you can never let go. If you accept, you can never relinquish. The price is great. Your Forebears paid. This way is fraught with peril. The reward, however, is greater than gold, brighter than diamonds." [More]
Mike H sets out on a quest.

A Certain Outcome for Holder?

The Borgs at the AP tell us resistance is futile, and Eric Holder will be confirmed by the full Senate Monday evening. They say there's nothing we can do, that "the outcome is not in doubt." [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner column explains how and why that came about, thanks largely in part to "our side."

I still recommend you keep pestering your senators. If nothing else, we need to train ourselves never to quit.

We also have a new columnist in Austin, Howard Nemerov. Consider that three-and-a-half months ago there was nothing.

As always, I ask you to help us continue to grow by sharing GRE links with your friends, posting to forums... I hope the regulars who find value here here make that a regular practice. In any case, until someone steps forward and gives me a substantial advertising budget, I'm going to keep asking you to.

Check out the latest from other Gun Rights Examiners


This Day in History: January 30

January 30, 1777

- In Jamaica, attorneys claim that American vessels and their crews captured by British warships prior to January 1, 1776, when the Trade Prohibitory Act became effective could not be detained. [More]

Thursday, January 29, 2009

"As Ineffective as Most Prohibitions"

Hobbled by the Supreme Court decision in D.C. v. Heller, recognizing that individuals have a constitutionally protected right to keep and bear arms, gun control advocates are roaming the land with virtual lightbulbs over their heads. "Ah ha," they say. You can have your guns, but we'll control your ammunition. [More]
J. D. Tuccille makes the rounds and presents some bullet points.

I really deserve to be smacked for that, at least twice, don't I?

Recreational shooting would be severely curtailed or destroyed entirely.
Cut back practice and training--there's a surefire happy ending solution! Why wouldn't we want people less trained, less able to hit what they aim at?

Government--is there anything it doesn't know?

Jury Duty

I have been summoned for jury duty in King County Superior Court. Initially, I was thrilled to have an opportunity to do my duty. Moments later it occurred to me that the court would most likely want me to convict someone of violating unconstitutional laws, like laws criminalizing drugs, sex, guns, etc. [More]
Mark A. Taff thinks through a process most of us will face.

We're the Only Ones Elite Enough

We only use off-duty police officers [More]
Why does the slogan "We use only 100% pure 'Only Ones'" come to mind?

I can't help but wonder if--all other things being equal--public status gives private advantage in terms of privileges or access if some reworking of applicable laws might not be in order.

For example: Can a LEO acting in a private capacity carry in places forbidden to a non-LEO bodyguard? If so, does that not equate to the law giving him a competitive advantage in private ventures and, in effect, ensure unequal protection in terms of earning a living?

I'm not saying this is so--I'm just askin'. If anybody knows, please educate me.

[Via Mike H]

We're the Only Ones in Suspense Enough

A Chattanooga detective accused of assaulting an elderly Wal-Mart greeter who asked to see his sales receipt has been suspended from duty. [More]
He's not really the "Only One" in suspense. I have been too, wondering how all that equal treatment under the law was going to work out...

[Via Ed M]

Potential Rape Victims Ordered to Wear Burkas or Face Fines

It's the same principle, you know.

Government. No wonder we love it so. [More]

[Via Ed M]

Justice Delayed

Five people imprisoned for the 1985 rape and murder of a 68-year-old woman were pardoned Monday, two months after investigators said DNA evidence proved they were innocent. [More]
One can only wonder how many enter pleas because they've been bullied into it over threatened consequences. And somehow, those who defrauded them into it remain free to do it again and again...

And remember: "They" hate us because we're free.

[Via Ed M]

We're the Only Ones Manning Our Post Enough

The U.S. government is investigating a former CIA officer in Algeria who has been accused of drugging and raping two women while he held the post, according to an affidavit released by the Justice Department. [More]
So much for the "intelligence" of "Only Ones"...

We're the Only Ones Solicitous Enough

VCU Police Chief Willie B. Fuller was arrested yesterday. The Chesterfield County Police Department media advisory states that Chief Fuller is charged "with use of a communications device to solicit sex from a minor and attempted indecent liberties with a minor." [More]
At least we can now guess why VCU "Only Ones" are so intent on maintaining a monopoly of force.

The Age Old Question, however, remains a mystery.

[Via AntiCitizenOne]

What the Brady Campaign Means by 'Home Rule'

Ah, the old "home rule" argument.

You know, their position that places like Washington DC should be able to enact gun bans. Just like President Obama's Chicago/Cheyenne sleight of mind...

It's a great trick to use on those who aren't paying attention. You distract everyone with talk about assaults on local control, and then you enact sweeping legislation that encompasses everybody everywhere. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column focuses on a common deception propagated by the anti-gunners-- when "home rule" favors citizen disarmament, they're for it. When it doesn't, it's time to being in the feds.

I'd like to see more gun rights activists pick up on this argument and use it. You can start by sharing the link to today's column.

Check out the latest from other Gun Rights Examiners:

This Day in History: January 29

Your wish, to be the instrument of restoring peace, to a much oppressed and more injured People, is certainly most laudable, but you must very well know, that this is not to be effected by the interposition of any person in a private Character, and Lord and General Howe have refused to negotiate with the only great representative Body of this Continent. [More]

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Holder Approved by Subcommittee

Go to Gun Rights Examiner for details. [More]