This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
All law enforcement personnel should be held to a higher standard than us dumb slobs. After all THEY'RE the ones with all the training and expertise. In any incident involving use of deadly force, what would be a simple defense for us should be an affirmative defense for LEOs. The burden of proof should be on THEM to prove that their use of deadly force was justified. I think that if they had to prove in a court of law (both civil and criminal) that their actions were justified we'd see a lot fewer shootings and have lot fewer innocent citizens killed by LEOs.
2 comments:
The only ones failing to maintain a safe following distance?
https://www.themaven.net/pinacnews/public-records/drunk-hitchhiker-charged-with-murdering-cop-who-died-rear-ending-stopped-car-0PsuPKWq50CRRvmzTQVDSQ/
http://www.bladeempire.com/news/report-on-accident-that-claimed-life-of-concordia-man/article_467b5216-6ffe-11e8-a26d-5bc5eef00aff.html
Calvin Stewart, 47, Salina, walked into the roadway in front of the Wimberley vehicle, causing him to take evasive action.
Wimberley applied his brakes, coming to a complete stop in the driving lanes.
McCawley had to come to a complete stop to avoid striking the Wimberley vehicle.
Henry was unable to stop in time, and struck the rear of McCawley's vehicle.
Henry, an officer with the Concordia Police Department, was transported to the Ottawa County Health Center, and later pronounced dead.
Stewart, who was not injured, was arrested at the scene and charged with pedestrian under the influence and second degree murder.
All law enforcement personnel should be held to a higher standard than us dumb slobs. After all THEY'RE the ones with all the training and expertise. In any incident involving use of deadly force, what would be a simple defense for us should be an affirmative defense for LEOs. The burden of proof should be on THEM to prove that their use of deadly force was justified. I think that if they had to prove in a court of law (both civil and criminal) that their actions were justified we'd see a lot fewer shootings and have lot fewer innocent citizens killed by LEOs.
Yeah, I know. Fat chance of THAT happening.
Post a Comment