Friday, November 09, 2007

Heller Watch

Today's the day...
Posted by David Codrea at 11/09/2007 08:39:00 AM

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am excited and will be watching the news Tuesday to see if SCOTUS will take it on.

An objective and honest review of the 2nd Ammendment will be a huge score for restoring the RKBA in this country.

11/09/2007 12:17 PM
me said...

An objective and honest review of the 2nd Ammendment will be a huge score for restoring the RKBA in this country.

that's the problem, we won't GET objective and honest, we'll get appeasement and reasonable restrictions, they won't admit they lied to us and twisted the real meaning this long. I have no faith in anyone that belongs to the government anymore, ok, at least not 99.9% of them.

11/09/2007 1:41 PM
Anonymous said...

Whether or not the U.S. Supreme Court takes on Parker or Heller there is another Second Amendment case up at bat at the U.S. Supreme Court: Hamrick v. United Nations/United States (from 8th Circuit, Case No. 07-2400, dismissed for refusal to pay the filing fee). Hey! But I am exempt from paying the Court's filing fee! I am a seaman under 28 U.S.C. 1916. That means the 8th Circuit committed Extortion Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. 872. Long story short I sent my Petition for Writ of Certiorari via FedEx Ground. It is a case for the Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial. I included ample evidence of extortion, even 2 court orders signed off on by DC Circuit Judge John G. Roberts (now the Chief Justice for the U.S. Supreme Court) which is sufficient evidence for my Citizen's Arrest Warrant that is also included in my Petition for Writ of Certiorari. This was necessary because the federal courts have pulled every dirty trick in the book to keep my case from going to trial. To download my Petition for Writ of Certiorari go here:
http://americancommondefencereview.wordpress.com/

11/09/2007 8:31 PM
Anonymous said...

From the article:

"The Second Amendment says, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Gun-control advocates say this means that the government can limit firearms ownership as part of its power to regulate the militia. Gun ownership is cast as a collective right, with the government organizing armed citizens to protect homeland security."

"Gun-control critics contend that the well-regulated militia is beside the point, and say the Constitution protects an individual's right to possess guns."

Bull$hit!

Firstly we are NOT "Gun Control Critics" We are civil rights proponents. As in the Bill of Rights.

Secondly we do NOT contend that "the well regulated Militia is beside the point" We contend that the militia IS the people, and that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Freaking hacks!

11/09/2007 9:44 PM
Anonymous said...

and we further contend that "well regulated" means it functions properly. Just as in a well regulated clock. There was even a clock brand years ago named REGULATOR. The name referred to the proper functioning of the clock. Just as our founders intended the proper functioning of the militia, due to it regulating itself in means, training and service.

11/10/2007 3:30 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)