This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
That's how I want them shooting at ME, if they ever do: standing on one leg, one-hand hold, standing upright beside cover, not crouched behind it --especially smooth metal cover, for nice ricochets -- with the sun in their eyes. In a bright white T-shirt.
6 comments:
Was the individual ever identified?
That's how I want them shooting at ME, if they ever do: standing on one leg, one-hand hold, standing upright beside cover, not crouched behind it --especially smooth metal cover, for nice ricochets -- with the sun in their eyes. In a bright white T-shirt.
It's still there ... you have to move a bit down the street.
They didn't remove the photo, they simply hid it by shifting the page everyone was looking at.
Might be deliberate, might be a database stupid.
OK ... it looks like they just removed the frame where it was obvious he was pointing a pistol.
The ones just afterwards and before are still there.
They can use the disappearing image as part of a new ad campaign that's in line with their thinking...
"If it isn't on google, it doesn't exist!"
How many days difference between the Google location queries? If it were more than one I'm not surprised it would shift or disappear altogether.
It ought to disturb us that this good an image appears at "street" level at all.
Post a Comment