Sunday, November 30, 2008

Lessons from Memsahib Brady Nirvana

Only a small group of determined monsters created the carnage...
And perhaps the most troubling question to emerge for the Indian authorities was how, if official estimates are accurate, just 10 gunmen could have caused so much carnage and repelled Indian security forces for more than three days in three different buildings.
...by exploiting a disarmed victim pool...
The Oberoi Group employs many plainclothes security officers in its hotels, but these are unarmed, Oberoi said. Obtaining a license for even a single officer to carry a gun is extremely difficult in India, which has tight gun control laws.

Yet even security guards armed with handguns might hesitate to resist an assault by heavily armed terrorists who have a detailed knowledge of the hotel's layout, as was the case at the Oberoi and Taj.
So much for relying on the "Only Ones."
Pros deride terrible tactics and poor equipment in face of Mumbai crisis
Fortunately, the elites and well-connected were taken care of:
"Last night, as the events of the terror attack unfolded in front of me I did something for the first time and one that I had hoped never ever to be in a situation to do. Before retiring for the night, I pulled out my licensed .32 revolver, loaded it and put it under my pillow. For a very disturbed sleep," the megastar wrote on his blog.
This is a nearly laboratory-perfect example of "gun control" in practice. The lesson is just this clear, just this direct: Disarming people renders them defenseless. Predators don't obey disarmament edicts. Authorities can't prevent atrocities, only respond to them.

That's no surprise to those of us who have been screaming this into the wind for years. Whether the dawning of realization will stick with the "Authorized Journalists," who's voices drown out ours, remains to be seen. I doubt it, but if anything will illustrate their intellectual disconnect, this will:
Mumbai photographer: I wish I'd had a gun, not a camera. Armed police would not fire back
That's odd--the latest Brady News Release is silent on the whole affair, focusing instead on doing what they do best--recycling and magnifying old lies to further erode the foundations of Liberty.

In light of stark reality, don't they look ridiculous and contemptible?

[Via Avg Joe, Cris C, Ron W, Plug Nickel Times]

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

I'd still like to know how one man with two pistols, a 9mm and a .22, killed 32 young, physically able adults. Even though they were disarmed by the school, it's just incredible. I could see how 10 guys with full auto's could do what they did.

Anonymous said...

The siege exposed problems caused by inexperienced security forces and inadequate equipment, including a lack of high-power rifle scopes and other optics to help discriminate between the attackers and civilians.

Oh fer cryin' out loud...

Anonymous said...

Wow even the ONLY ONES in India have to jump thru flaming hoops of red tape to carry a weapon?

Anonymous said...

I just remembered after a Marriot bombing a few years ago somewhere, I was visiting my sister at another Marriott in Orlando. Semi AK underfolder w/75 round drum in my duffel bag. Tell me I'm paranoid now, people.

Anonymous said...

In years past, Indian police had to account for every bullet issued/used.

One report noted armed police at the train station, the first shooting gallery, heading for the hills rather than engage the enemy.

The sheep will again demand the guns be removed, and the sheep will die again and again, never knowing they signed their own death warrants.

The shooters likely did number at least twice the 'ten'. They had to have had transport to the train station from the boat, unless more likely, the boat guys engaged only at the Taj and/or Trident, close to the water while pre-staged killers took to the train station, the Jewish ctr, a movie theater, etc.

I cannot fathom the sheep mentality and can surely not imagine having no weapons to defend myself with.

Anonymous said...

... raised machine guns over their heads to indiscriminately fire into windows at terrorists.
"I find it hard to justify that kind of shooting," said Chris Voss, a former FBI lead international hostage negotiator


And it looks like India's "Only Ones" learnt how to shoot from watching John Singleton movies...

Loren said...

The photographer who saw the cops not shooting is here:
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/article14086308.ece

It was on a livejournal community.

Anonymous said...

Foreign news sources are saying not all the shooters were "indian-looking".

"Gaffar Abdul Amir, an Iraqi tourist from Baghdad, says he saw at least two men who started the firing outside the Leopold Cafe.

He was returning to his hotel from the seaside with a friend when he saw two men carrying bags and brandishing AK-47s walking in front of them, shooting.

"They did not look Indian, they looked foreign. One of them, I thought, had blonde hair. The other had a punkish hairstyle. They were neatly dressed," says Mr Amir."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7752625.stm

So here we have a "terrorist" group previously unknown, foreign attackers and discrepancies between hostages and attackers in the Chabad house nearby.

Can anyone say Black Op?

BourneShooter said...

Or its the recruits from england and its radical mosques?

But then Iran has been seen in Iraq with western looking operatives acting as PSC's carrying out attacks.

Black Ops are an option as always.

Anonymous said...

s/Lesons/Lessons/

;-)

Regards,

Mark A. Taff

David Codrea said...

Well, there goes my track record for a mistake-free life...