Saturday, November 28, 2009

Chicago Gun Case Brief Shows Prohibitionists Unreasonable

What they're saying in the Chicago case is essentially the same thing they said in the Heller Washington D.C. case: Gun bans are "reasonable" and consistent with the Second Amendment proscription that "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

This does not surprise anyone who has been watching these Brady characters for any length of time. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column shows what the Bradys mean when they say "reasonable common sense gun laws."

Also get the latest from my fellow GREs.

Tell a friend?

2 comments:

Mack said...

"Subjects like you and me aren't allowed anything."

Oleg continues to impress.

Chas said...

Markie Marxist sez: "Of course gun bans are consistent with the Second Amendment! "Shall not be infringed" means the same thing as "shall be infringed". The two phrases are mutually interchangeable and identical in meaning. Anyone can see that. It's just common communist sense."