Several times! [Read]
No such luck for me, despite some promising signs. Guess I'd better try harder.
Jeez, what's a feller have to do to get branded a "hater" by these commie bedwetters?
Friday, November 18, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Your just going to have to try harder.
Well, at least they covered the RTC Rally, even if they didn't actually mention the fact that we were openly armed at Ft Hunt (with no one getting hurt). I'd have been disappointed if we didn't make it there.
They also posted a picture from that rally, one of the very few pictures they put up at all.
As for Mike, they mention Absolved as the "inspiration" of the geriatric plot and throw in a byline about the bricks thing, but they didn't think the breaking their windows was worthy at the time? (I've got a pdf printout of the whole thing from today just in case they decide to update it later)
Don't worry David, we all know you're on their enemies list too, and I for one am proud to be their enemy.
Okay I'm confused: how does Dick Heller stating that citizens are first responders to terrorist incidents constitute "insurrection".
And how is a woman using a gun to kill a physically abusive husband who was going to set off a dirty bomb "insurrection" or, really, bad in any way?
And how is the NRA engaging in political activism "insurrection"?
And how is Glenn Beck hosting a show to explain to politicians what (he thinks) mainstream Americans believe in "insurrection"?
And I'm tired of reading their drivel, but I just want to point out one more thing: the CSGV seems to be against people participating in the political process, speaking their minds and defending themselves and their neighbors from violent predators. No *wonder* they don't want anyone to have guns; they want to turn us into Stalinist Russia!
Couldn't help but notice that the coalition pantie-wetters misquoted Mike.
The sentence didn't make sense, so I followed the link, and they changed one word in a Vanderboegh quote.
It kinda changes the meaning of the whole sentence. Here's the offending version: "If we break the windows of hundreds, thousands, of Democratic party headquarters across this country, we might just (MAKE)(sic) up enough of them to make defending ourselves at the muzzle of a rifle unnecessary." Mike wrote "wake" not "make."
Mistake, or capriciousness?
Methinks the latter.
Post a Comment