Monday, January 21, 2013

Me Too

So telling a Democrat you're willing to actually physically defend what is yours is now an actionable threat ? [Read

Blanket dragnet, anyone?

1 comment:

Ed said...

It is curious that the reporter can detail the weapons and ammunition in the house, but gives no details on the defects in the house that led to the condemnation. As a vacant lot, there would be minimal tax revenue generated compared to a lot improved by a home. The local government may want to remove vacant homes, but that alone is usually insufficient grounds to condemn a property. It appears in this case that the condemnation process is forcing the vacancy, which is circular logic.

Perhaps some Greenpeace-like activists can be recruited to jump in front of the bulldozer?