Wednesday, May 30, 2018

So Police AREN'T 'There to Protect Us'?

“Plaintiff’s claims share a common question: whether there is constitutional duty under the Fourteenth Amendment for the police to intervene to protect a citizen from criminal conduct by third parties,” Judge Norman K. Moon’s opinion says. “Because I find this duty is not ‘clearly established,’ his claims are barred by qualified immunity.” [More]
Who knew?

And that being the case, who but an idiot or an enemy would prevent a fellow human being from having the means to protect himself?

[Via Mack H]

2 comments:

Mack said...

This is a major opinion.

Even so, the whiners out for social justice say they will appeal.

Good luck with that.

Anonymous said...

I appreciate this contemporaneous confirmation that neither coppers nor any other govt. actor have any duty to defend and protect any particular citizen.