Hawaii AG Russell A. Suzuki tries to undermine the Young case by claiming unconcealed carry permits aren't "limited to private security officers," and then proceeds to define "standards" that no one will be able to meet. [More]
Any HI gun owners out there that want to test that assertion?
Friday, September 14, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
“To satisfy these requirements, an applicant must demonstrate, among other things, that he or she has a need for protection that substantially exceeds that held by ordinary law-abiding citizens.”
Because, as we all understand, the Bill of Rights doesn’t apply to AVERAGE citizens, just citizens whose needs EXCEED average citizens. Why, that’s just Common Sense (tm)!
Odd. I do not see the terms "sufficient urgency and need" and "good moral character" in any of the rights defined by the U.S. Constitution and its Amendments. Could someone please point our where they are?
Post a Comment