Wednesday, July 24, 2019

In the Interest of Public Safety?

ATF Issues Guidance To Alabama FFLs Effective Immediately [More]
Here's the stated reason:
Because county sheriffs have issued CCP permits s without completing a full NICS check, firearms have been transferred to felons and other prohibited individuals in violation of federal law, thereby creating a substantial public safety concern. For this reason, the standards set forth in the Brady law require us to find that Alabama’s CCP permits no longer qualify as a NICS check alternative. In the interest of public safety, and effective immediately, FFLs in Alabama may no longer accept CCP permits as an alternative to a NICS check. Unless another exception applies, a NICS check must be conducted whenever you transfer a firearm to an unlicensed person even if the individual presents an unexpired CCP permit.
So, as with "bump stocks," they've reversed themselves again.

I'm trying to determine if they have evidence of widespread system "failures" to back this move or if they're simply making an excuse for another reversal. If you have knowledge that can shed light on this, please educate us in "comments."

UPDATE:
Federal officials did not name the sheriffs who issued the permits ... they have not released the names of those counties ... 
Sounds like it's time for another FOIA.

Meanwhile, the bottom line reflects the desired effect:
“It really doesn’t matter what we think,’’ Thomas said. “We’re going to do what we’re told to do.”
You remember that and we just may let you live.

2 comments:

Vince Warde said...

OK, this commEnt will not be popular. I do not believe that FBI/ATF are trying pull a fast one here. The reason is simple: This move creates a great deal more work for them. I'm not surprised that they have not named the Sheriffs, and I am sure that they are covering for them. It could be that this directive is temporary, and could be reversed if they run the required checks. If nothing happens, yes we should demand that they tell us which counties have failed to do NICS checks. I would be willing to bet that these sheriff are gun control advocates.

Krog said...

These same county Sheriffs had a hissy fit and blocked Constitutional Carry because 'public safety'. That was obviously a bald faced lie.