Showing posts sorted by date for query red queen laws. Sort by relevance Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by date for query red queen laws. Sort by relevance Show all posts

Thursday, February 17, 2022

Something Must Be Done! But What?

 Virginia State Police spokesperson Corinne Geller declined to say how Campbell got the guns that have been recovered in the investigation of the fatal shootings at Bridgewater. But she told The Times-Dispatch that he obtained them legally, had them in his possession legally and that the weapons had not been reported stolen. Geller also said the guns were purchased legally in Virginia, but she would not say whether Campbell bought them or someone else did. A search of court records in Hanover and Rockingham counties turned up no evidence of anything that would have prevented Campbell from legally having a gun. [More]

So "background checks" are no guarantee?

I suppose "we" could always impose insane, totalitarian "Red Queen Laws," or, here's an idea: If credible, behavior/action-based evidence exists that a person poses a danger to himself and/or others, investigate it, obtain a warrant if probable cause exists, perform a lawful intervention, and then afford full due process equivalent to a jury trial, with the burden of proof on the state to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, with appropriate humane treatment and/or custodial measures if it does. 

Of course, it's not perfect. Who or what is?

If you have a better idea, I'm listening and, if you really do, would support it.

[Via Mack H]

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Liar for Sheriff!

 I am a Republican who supports the Second Amendment. I respect the entire Bill of Rights, and Constitution. I have raised my hand and sworn to uphold the Constitution in every position I’ve held. I take that oath very seriously. [More]

That must be why he supports insane, totalitarian prior restraint Red Queen laws.

[Via Jess]

Monday, May 11, 2020

Sentence First — Verdict Afterwards

This is intentional. This is the depth to which activists will go to undermine the possibility of affording an accused student minimal due process. Lawyers like Patel are deliberately trying to undermine the presumption of innocence to gain leverage with their useful idiots (for who else but an idiot would buy her nonsense?) against the new regs? [More]
More Red Queen laws...

Kinda makes you wonder what her parents were hoping to leave behind...

[Via Michael G]

Tuesday, November 19, 2019

Red Queen Laws Redux



I still prefer the original, but anything that helps illustrate the point...

Monday, November 11, 2019

Red Queen Laws

‘No, no!’ said the Queen. ‘Sentence first — verdict afterwards.’ [More]
Actually, that was the Queen of Hearts who said that -- not the Red Queen -- but damn if it's not applicable. "We" truly have gone down the rabbit hole and through the looking-glass.

I rediscovered this quote while researching something entirely different over at Sipsey Street.  Mike's been gone over three years now, and some of us are still benefiting from his insights.