Tuesday, November 14, 2006

From the Birthplace of Liberty

A few doors down, her block captain, Lorraine Armstrong, thinks one answer to gun violence in her West Philadelphia neighborhood is for police to stop and frisk suspects.
What is it with these Cellblock Snitch types?

Always my favorite line that inevitably oozes bubbling and reeking to the surface in stories of this type:
"If you've got nothing to be guilty about, you should have no problem. I would put up with that level of inconvenience to make the neighborhood safer," he said.
Talk about someone with an appropriate name:
We've seen some of these tactics utilized in other places," said former City Councilman Michael A. Nutter, now a candidate for mayor and a proponent of stop-and-frisk.
Indeed we have, you nutter. And for you to suggest making it standard practice in the Birthplace of Liberty--and for the Heirs of Liberty to fall all over themselves demanding a freedom "buy back" in exchange for the fraudulent promise of safety, is one of the more sickening examples of how far increasingly large segments of our culture have allowed themselves to degenerate.
"I don't care whether you are black, white, purple or polka-dotted. If you have an illegal weapon, I expect a well-trained Philadelphia police officer to take that gun away."
At least Nutter's an equal opportunity tyrant wannabe. But I'm sure we were promised that Project Exile would end Philly's "gun problem."
"Guns are out there," said Carnegie-Mellon anticrime expert Alfred Blumstein, "but if you can reduce the carrying, you've made some important progress."
Professor, Carnegie Mellon just lost an ethical giant who championed gun rights. It's a shame that their voice on this issue now emanates from a stunted intellect like yours.
In Philadelphia, by contrast, an even larger share - 87 percent - of homicides are committed with guns, Johnson said, and more than 32,000 permits to carry concealed weapons have been issued to city residents since the state gun law made it easier in 1995.
Here we go with another predictable twist--it's the fault of all those law-abiding, nonviolent people who submit themselves to background checks to prove they're not criminals. If we can just disarm them...

This is the logic that has the inmates bleating for more. And they are the sheep who cancel out your vote, and impose their pathetic and disgusting dependence on collectivism and tyranny on the rest of us.


[Via Cousin G]

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Statist pricks. They don't want to crush any semblance of liberty.... 'wink' 'wink', 'nudge' 'nudge'...

"I don't support stop-and-frisk, per se," the sociologist said. "I support any program that could lower homicide and does not pose a threat to civil liberties."
Lawrence Sherman, a University of Pennsylvania criminologist

Or this one...
"This isn't apartheid. I'm not going to break the law to enforce the law. We're in federal court right now with an NAACP suit about profiling,"
Police Commissioner Sylvester M. Johnson

But... if we make all guns "illegal" then we don't have a problem, right? 'wink' 'wink', 'nudge' 'nudge'...

"This is not something crafted out of thin air. [stop and frisk]We've seen some of these tactics utilized in other places,"
Nutter said the program should begin with intensive training for police in "probable cause" and "articulable suspicion"
Former City Councilman Michael A. Nutter, now a candidate for mayor.

Lets just make sure we teach our oppressors to have a properly worded fig leaf to use when they start frisking people...
He was walking funny your honor, he looked like we had a weapon in his jacket when I saw him...
'wink' 'wink', 'nudge' 'nudge'...

Think I'm over reacting?

My favorite quote:

"Someone wearing a winter coat on a hot day might be suspected of hiding a weapon. A man holding his arm in front of something in his waist band might also draw suspicion.

Officers have to stay within the bounds of this state Supreme Court ruling: "Any curtailment of a person's liberty by the police must be supported at least by a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the person seized is engaged in criminal activity."

And as long as being able to defend one's self remains a criminal activity, statists among us have all the pretext they need.

As David said, disgusting.

E. David Quammen said...

Adolph Hitler, before he cowardly committed suicide in the bunker. Told his secretary that "The world wasn't ready for National Socialism, but that it would be in a hundred years."

Well, we all know that the 'fuhrer' was insane, so it's no wonder that he was off in his time estimate.....

Anonymous said...

Wish I had the dough to do it, I'd put up a roadside billboard on the highways a'leavin Texas in those three languages about leaving the American Sector. Maybe with a big picture of a grinning Chuck Schummer and Frau Hillary alongside it. Notice how Chucky Boy has been grinning from ear to ear lately?