Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Kathryn Johnston's Gun to Blame for Her Death

A handgun is not some useful tool that offers its owner safety and piece of mind. If it were, a gun-toting old lady in Atlanta would have survived Thanksgiving... Had she been without her precious gun, she’d no doubt be alive today.
One lying Constable shills for other lying constables.

Actually, I'm surprised it took the "it's her gun's fault" thesis this long to ooze to the surface.

What a disgusting and contemptible excuse for a man. No wonder he runs behind the skir...uh...slacks of a woman who is hostile to men--particularly the gun-owning kind, to bolster his snotty self-loathing.

He's obviously trolling for angry emails, presumably so he can show his editor how important he is--and he's counting on most of them being expressed in ways that "sophisticates" can feel superior to. If you're inclined to write but don't want to play his game, allow me to make a suggestion: Just send him the link to "The Anti-Gun Male" (http://www.gunowners.org/wv36.htm) with no other comment.

[Via HZ]

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

So much garbage to address, so little time. Very little was said about Kathryn Johnston, although it was the first paragraph. And I couldn't find a link or email address so I could write back.

Of course, it wasn't her gun's fault; it was the cops' fault. They raided the wrong house, and then had the gall to lie about it! They're nothing less than criminal in my book!

Anonymous said...

The contact info is on this page.

Anonymous said...

So - how does this maroon "know" that Mrs. Johnston would "still be alive" if she didn't have a gun?

How many no-knock drug warrants have resulted in deaths without the victim having a gun with which to defend him or herself?

More likely, since this who thing stinks, the JBTs that broke down her door would have shot anyone they saw.

After all, the mere "belief" that an alleged "criminal" had a gun resulted in 50 shots being fired into a car loaded with unarmed partygoers in NY.

How does this hand-wringing panty-wearer address THAT fact?

This bit of "reporting" is simply a diaphanous attempt to promote the illogical rantings of a man-hating anti-self defense self-promoting female author.

So after two deaths in several days - one, the murder of an armed citizen defending her home, and one the death of an unarmed reveler, and the "gun" is at fault.

It real lesson is - if JBTs want to kill you, they simply have to say that they "thought" you had a gun.

Idiot.

me said...

“The armed citizen can in the end only protect as far as his gun can shoot. Government of the people and for the people can protect an entire land.”

Wow, that sounds like what the founders had in mind, armed citizens who protected each other and didn't rely on the police.

I think the woman would be alive today if common street thugs weren't allowed to take the word of ONE lying bastard trying to get a lighter sentence. Maybe they should have INVESTIGATED before sending in street clothes with a so-called warrant...sounds more like the woman did something he didn't like, he got popped and wanted some government/ghetto justice. That or they were just going shopping to line their pockets.

me said...

Hmmm, this sounds familiar. Bunch of guys burst into home claiming to be cops, shoot people, unarmed occupant guy is wounded trying to escape.

http://www.thewbalchannel.com/news/10422880/detail.html