Canada's billion-dollar national gun registry doesn't keep up-to-date stats on the number of legal handguns in the country, the Sun has learned.
Meanwhile, Canadian urban violent crime escalates, as do calls to ban guns owned by citizens obedient enough to be registered. That a gun from the registry was apparently used in one of the anecdotes related here has served to fuel that--despite the obvious, that it was used illegally.
It's just so totally freaking insane. That anyone can't see it, that we're even having an argument points to a monumental convergence of evil--that would be you, Messrs. Layton, McGuinty and Miller-- ignorance--that would be you, Canadian citizen gun control advocates--and abdication--that would be everybody not engaged in opposing them.
The registry doesn't work as a crime fighting tool because it was never supposed to: the controllers know it's just a matter of probability before a listed gun is used in a criminal act, which they can then leverage into a blood dance opportunity. The hidden end is, the biggest proponents of maintaining and expanding the registry are the ones who ultimately want it to disappear completely--just as soon as there are no private--I mean, "legally owned" guns to register.
[Via Bruce Mills]
5 comments:
The bottom line is the Liberal Party of Canada lied to firearms owners when they said registration would not lead to confiscation. Bill C-68, the Firearms Act promptly made about half the handguns illegal and also banned many long arms based on their physical appearance. During the last election the Liberals platform included a total handgun ban and and a total ban on semi-automatic firearms. The Liberals, their political allies the NDP and the Bloc along with the anti-gun lobby and media continue to rely on fear mongering, demagoguery, propaganda and sensationalism to hawk their lies.
It is imperative we challenge them at every turn when they repeat their propaganda and stand in the blood of innocents for cheap photo ops.
They don't deserve our vote, our respect or our tolerance. Expose them for what they are.
Sounds similar to the lies fed to the sheep here, Eh? Where's the big mirror, it time to smash it to bits.
Layton and Miller? Really? What are the odds that pairing would appear to be significant again?
US v. Miller, Jack Miller and Frank Layton.
Confiscation of firearms is not required to avoid restrictions of the 2nd Amendment.
It's enough to make AMMUNITION ownership prohibitively costly.
http://tinyurl.com/35ual6
It seems we are fast approaching the time when transfer of possession of ammunition components may be called for.
Post a Comment