This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Perhaps this is that elusive Federal license to carry everywhere that I have been trying to nail down forever, and been assured that they do not exist.
I offer this in support. The BATFE will not issue a C&R or dealers' license to anyone who lives in areas where local laws prohibit the activity. To even move your collection to another residence requires a resubmission of application and the ATF clearly states that its issuance is predicated upon compliance of the licensee with all state and local laws and will be rejected if it is determined to be counter to the laws of the new residence. Thus, a C&R holder may not move his collection without permission. Yet this license was issued to a DC resident where he is not allowed to own, possess, use, or even move from one room of his home to another with a firearm. So, obviously this is that elusive "carry anywhere and fuck 'em if they don't like it" license I have been assured does not exist, even though I know a have personally known a man who holds one. He too, by the way, was of very poor character. A thief in Virginia State Police Uniform until his retirement.
He was stopped in Boston with his piece and the cops thought they had him, until he showed them he could carry any damn where he wished and they couldn't do a damn thing about it. He can carry on commercial vehicles and nobody can stop him. Ironically, his carry gun is one of a matched set he stole (illegally confiscated) from a collector. The judge who heard the case when the suit came to trial has the other to the matched set.
Sorry for the rant, but I have never been able to get anyone in any government position to admit this license exists, even though I have seen it work. I think maybe now I have actually seen it.
Regardless, the Bureau has violated the policy it claims all must follow before a license may be issued. Unless, of course, it is that elusive "Carry Anywhere" license.
If they even choose to comment on this, which I highly doubt they will, the spin will no doubt be "We have many people attempt to turn guns into our office, and in order to accommodate taking and destroying these guns, we solicited help from the BATF in obtaining a federal firearms license so we could legally take possession."
Of course, how the hell they a) got and b) still have a license is something the ATF should answer, but again, probably won't.
they certainly don't have a brick and mortar storefront with regular hours as has been required for a long time now. There is no way they could have met the ATF's regs. Yet they have it.
Jail time is indicated here for all involved, ALL. In and out of the ATF.
This is some really old news...GOA broke it back in 1995. It's fabulous that the blogosphere is drawing so much attention to it though!
http://www.gunowners.org/op9509.htm
------- His monograph, More Gun Dealers Than Gas Stations, became the source for the debate on FFLs in the next Congress. (Mr. Sugarmann is listed as the holder of two FFLs himself--both giving Washington, DC addresses, one being that of his Violence Policy Center.) -------
Yes, this is really old news… Alan Gottlieb and I "busted" Sugarmann's infiltration of the 1991 Gun Rights Policy Conference in Philadelphia… no big whoop since it was open admission. But I've seen Sugarmann at both SHOT Shows in Texas in the mid'90s and at one of Andy Molchan's Firearms Trade Expos in Atlantic City in '97 or '98, each time wearing an FFL Dealer's admission badge.
But some here are ignoring the Type 03 (C&R) FFL, a much easier licensee to obtain, and one with less strict requirements, only that the firearms obtained are on ATF's Curios and Relics list. Many collectors go this route.
6 comments:
Did you notice there is no trade name?
Perhaps this is that elusive Federal license to carry everywhere that I have been trying to nail down forever, and been assured that they do not exist.
I offer this in support. The BATFE will not issue a C&R or dealers' license to anyone who lives in areas where local laws prohibit the activity. To even move your collection to another residence requires a resubmission of application and the ATF clearly states that its issuance is predicated upon compliance of the licensee with all state and local laws and will be rejected if it is determined to be counter to the laws of the new residence. Thus, a C&R holder may not move his collection without permission. Yet this license was issued to a DC resident where he is not allowed to own, possess, use, or even move from one room of his home to another with a firearm. So, obviously this is that elusive "carry anywhere and fuck 'em if they don't like it" license I have been assured does not exist, even though I know a have personally known a man who holds one. He too, by the way, was of very poor character. A thief in Virginia State Police Uniform until his retirement.
He was stopped in Boston with his piece and the cops thought they had him, until he showed them he could carry any damn where he wished and they couldn't do a damn thing about it. He can carry on commercial vehicles and nobody can stop him. Ironically, his carry gun is one of a matched set he stole (illegally confiscated) from a collector. The judge who heard the case when the suit came to trial has the other to the matched set.
Sorry for the rant, but I have never been able to get anyone in any government position to admit this license exists, even though I have seen it work. I think maybe now I have actually seen it.
Regardless, the Bureau has violated the policy it claims all must follow before a license may be issued. Unless, of course, it is that elusive "Carry Anywhere" license.
Maybe this Mr Sugarmann is a "Special" Only One.
If they even choose to comment on this, which I highly doubt they will, the spin will no doubt be "We have many people attempt to turn guns into our office, and in order to accommodate taking and destroying these guns, we solicited help from the BATF in obtaining a federal firearms license so we could legally take possession."
Of course, how the hell they a) got and b) still have a license is something the ATF should answer, but again, probably won't.
they certainly don't have a brick and mortar storefront with regular hours as has been required for a long time now. There is no way they could have met the ATF's regs. Yet they have it.
Jail time is indicated here for all involved, ALL. In and out of the ATF.
This is some really old news...GOA broke it back in 1995. It's fabulous that the blogosphere is drawing so much attention to it though!
http://www.gunowners.org/op9509.htm
-------
His monograph, More Gun Dealers Than Gas Stations, became the source for the debate on FFLs in the next Congress. (Mr. Sugarmann is listed as the holder of two FFLs himself--both giving Washington, DC addresses, one being that of his Violence Policy Center.)
-------
Yes, this is really old news… Alan Gottlieb and I "busted" Sugarmann's infiltration of the 1991 Gun Rights Policy Conference in Philadelphia… no big whoop since it was open admission. But I've seen Sugarmann at both SHOT Shows in Texas in the mid'90s and at one of Andy Molchan's Firearms Trade Expos in Atlantic City in '97 or '98, each time wearing an FFL Dealer's admission badge.
But some here are ignoring the Type 03 (C&R) FFL, a much easier licensee to obtain, and one with less strict requirements, only that the firearms obtained are on ATF's Curios and Relics list. Many collectors go this route.
Post a Comment