Guns are bad. Guns kill.Oh, look. Little boys making noise.
One question, Phil, Jacob and Brian: When the time comes, how do you children propose sharing this?
Friday, April 25, 2008
A Better Judgment
One question, Phil, Jacob and Brian: When the time comes, how do you children propose sharing this?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Interesting. My 5 year old didn't kill anyone last night. My evil black rifle must be defective.
It is also interesting that my 5 year old girl is more of a man than those guys. I'd comment, but I don't feel like registering.
What a great picture, Robb--and what a sweetie.
There's nothing cuter than a little girl--and nothing more contemptible than "men" who act like one.
I'm waiting for some tangentially-related information to appear online, and I'll be referencing back to your post when it does.
DAYUM, what puerile little children! And I'll bet these cretins are screening their comments, as the only two comments up are as anti-gun as their chicken-hearted screed.
Why do my fellow Jews have to be such unendurable weenies?
Doesn't take much intelligence to get into college these days.
sorry, fellas, but college today is mostly daycare for the terminally immature.
You have just seen three examples of why.
Huh.
Funny on his mainpage right now:
http://www.ps121.net/img/funny.jpg
If my logic is unmanly/unintelligent, then refute it.
Although there are a lot of reasons why having guns on a campus is dangerous, the worst is that it will inevitably lead to an arms race: If students carry handguns, then the bad guys will just get bigger guns, and then you will be lobbying for automatic weapons for students- it will never end.
(And Mr. Carpenter- that actually was really funny. Stupid Google Ads...)
Mr Levin,
First of all, horsecrap. There will not be an arms race. We don't see an arms race where firearms are currently allowed. Besides, I don't really care how large of a firearm a bad guy wants to carry. The larger they are the heavier and more difficult to control they are.
Secondly, according to the law of the land (the U.S. that is) students ought to be allowed access to automatic weapons. They fit into the category of "unorganized militia" after all.
Gun free zones do nothing but disarm the law abiding. Refute that.
Any other arguments that you need are available right here on this here website. Why don't you do a wee bit of research your ownself. We have refuted your position time and time again.
Mr. Levin, I haven't enough respect for you to bother reinventing the English language so you will understand.
If you have reached the age to attend college and remain as ignorant and arrogant as you have you are beyond salvage.
You will forever be a little unman.
I won't call a nonman, because children and women are nonmen, you are just unman.
If you have proof of your assertions, you prove up. We have already done so. You and your weak sisters make hysterical claims bolstered only by emotion. Immature emotion.
I do not expect you will try to provide fact to back up your false assertions because I think you already know you will discover fact that will take you out of your little girl comfort zone.
Go ahead, prove what you said is true. We have spent years proving undeniably what we say is true. It is your turn, weenie.
Translation: "We are poor little lambs who have lost our way, baa baa baa..."
{sigh} You have to understand: These people actually believe that UPD ("gun control") laws minimize deaths, and that a magic charm keeps polar bears away.
I observe that with great care Mr. Shapiro doesn't include himself in his cited examples of negligent behavior; he never gives a specific reason that he should stay disarmed; he never explicitly says "Disarm me". Could this mean that he doesn't feel he should be disarmed -- it's all those other untrustworthy people who should stay disarmed? If so, then what excludes him from that category?
Mr. Levin,
> Although there are a lot of reasons why having guns on a campus is dangerous, the worst is that it will inevitably lead to an arms race: If students carry handguns, then the bad guys will just get bigger guns,
....and die nevertheless.
> and then you will be lobbying for automatic weapons for students-
What do you mean, "and then"?
> it will never end.
Neither will Darwinian selection. Your point?
Speaking of that, has it entirely escaped your penetrating vision that students outnumber bad guys hundreds or thousands to one; and that bad guys attacking armed students results in....fewer &/or more-discreet bad guys (either one's fine by me)?
Mark Odell
It's pretty well agreed upon that bad guys can get a hold of whatever weapon they want and bring it wherever they want. Arming college students doesn't solve the problem, it conceals it. Sure maybe somebody gets lucky and shoots the next VT guy before he does any damage, but the goal is to prevent these guys from getting the weapons in the first place, not to just react once they whip them out in a classroom.
If you put sprinkles on a turd it will still taste like shit (I'd imagine).
Post a Comment