An analysis of this situation we need to look closely at comes from National Parks Examiner Randi Minetor, who notes:Today's Gun Rights Examiner column examines whether the National Parks rule is really the done deal some have represented it to be.
"...Justice is requiring the plaintiffs to prove their case more effectively within the requirements of federal law..."
As for the Bush rule change?
"[I]t was done in violation of laws that require environmental analysis before this kind of rule change is done." [More]
I expect there will be those who would rather we didn't talk about this, as much of it is coming from the Brady camp. I think it would be foolish to ignore the chatter, even bearing in mind there is much disinformation.
Part of our job is learning how to recognize that. And another part is hearing things we'd rather not.
Please pass the link around for discussion. The more awareness and input, the better off we'll be.
Check out the latest from other Gun Rights Examiners:
Austin: Obama: The anti-civil rights president?
Charlotte: The Carpenters: From tragedy rises heroism
DC: No right to arms, no vote in Congress!
Denver: Changing hearts and minds
Los Angeles: Gun control in churches, Part II: The Militia.
Milwaukee: Time to change our attitude about guns
Minneapolis: Open carry is the 2nd Amendment
St. Louis: Should effective self-defense be limited to the fit and strong?
No comments:
Post a Comment