Wednesday, June 27, 2018
The Plan to Save the World
Interesting. [More]
How this guy "knows" is another story, and a seemingly unstated one.
Amidst the moments of hopefulness, I do see things that raise some flags for me -- the biggest being they seem to be carrying out their plan without regard to those of us who insist on knowing what "they'll" be replacing things with and just who "they" are.
Some of us have very definite ideas about what is "necessary to the security of a free State," and you don't want to introduce yourself to us as our new boss.
[Via Tristan M]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
If you objectively delve into the "Q-Anon" phenomena, it becomes apparent that it is either a LARP (live action role playing) being done by a group of individuals with unknown motives or possibly a government run psyop being used to pacify the people into believing that there are high level government insiders fighting for justice against the "deep state" so everyone can just sit back and watch. It has reached a cult like status.
The majority of the predictions being released by "Q-Anon" read like cryptic Nostradamus Quatrains and are subject to wide interpretation to fit one's own personal biases. There have been many major predictions that never materialized, yet the Q-cult continues to push the false narrative and attack those who question it.
Seriously, this guy bases his entire premise on the claim that, “it is not human nature to take from others, it is not human nature to be racist?” Preverbal toddlers disprove the former every day at group playtime, and xenophobia is a well-understood reflex related to tribally-based security mechanisms. Higher animals show all these same behaviors for all the same reasons, and they have not been propagandized by anyone.
The whole QAnon phenomenon should show up in the deep orange zone of anyone with a well-calibrated gullibility meter. Like Anonymous, anyone can appropriate that name to anonymously publish any claims they want, and no one can tell if the information is “official” because the term is meaningless.
It’s ironic that conspiracy-oriented people get all up in arms about the terrible potential of video fakery (e.g., https://www.cbsnews.com/news/experts-warn-of-digitally-altered-video-becoming-weaponized/), but then blithely accept pronouncements purporting to originate from a single anonymous entity as genuine.
Post a Comment