Whether the court of appeals correctly denied a preliminary injunction where petitioners failed to demonstrate a likelihood of success on their contention that devices known as bump stocks, which permit users to fire a semiautomatic rifle repeatedly with a single pull of the trigger, do not qualify as “machinegun[s]” under the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. 5845(b). [More]
To save you some time: We declared them legal. Then we said they were illegal with a spring. Then we said they were legal without a spring. Now we say they're illegal without a spring.
And we still won't tell anyone if they were used.
So f*** everybody we lied to, including past inspectors and courts where we've testified under oath based on how we were feeling at the time, and help us uphold executive-directed bans that we all know the Democrats will use to go after all semi-autos when they take the White House.
[Via Stephen Stamboulieh]
2 comments:
I finally had the enough time to follow the More link today, and there was no link. :-(
I guess more than anything this shows I'm wasting my time including links at all.
Post a Comment