Westchester District Attorney Jeanine Pirro is challenging Hillary Clinton for her New York Senate seat.
"'My support in the Republican Party is broad and deep,’ Pirro told the AP when asked about a possible primary. She also said she would seek the Conservative Party's endorsement and noted that she had it for her races in Westchester County.”
“In 2006, New Yorkers will have a choice,” says the 1997 People magazine's "most beautiful people" listee.
So what kind of “choice” will a Conservative Party-endorsed candidate with “broad and deep” Republican Party support offer gun owners?
Oh, let’s just see.
She joined the New Yorkers Against Gun Violence anti-defense zealots in a Columbine High School Memorial Blood Dance to call “for renewal and strengthening of the federal assault weapons ban.”
She launched a “gun amnesty/buyback” program—“no questions asked,” naturally, “to get illegal and unwanted weapons off the streets.”
I guess gun rights aren’t important when your Republican fundraiser husband is a federal prison alumnus—as a felon, he can’t legally own a gun. Besides, when you have a taxpayer-funded bodyguard, one who made more than $87,000 in overtime in addition to his $101,000-plus salary, who need a personal gun?
The New York Republican establishment evidently believes gun owners are so cowed by the prospect of Hillary that they’ll vote for anyone.
The pathetic thing is, they’re probably right.
And don't even get me started on Rudy Giuliani.
Monday, August 08, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
If Clinton and pirro are the only two choices in this "race", then gun owners might as well not waste their time voting.
Keep Blogging!
Post a Comment