Tuesday, March 28, 2006

What Nicole Thinks

It was the rave scene that killed those poor kids Saturday on Capitol Hill. It was the city's weak All Ages Dance Ordinance. It was the weed they smoked, the beer they drank, the music that drained their heads of reason. It was the parents who didn't keep track. Stop.

What killed those people was a 28-year-old man named Kyle Huff, who took advantage of American gun laws and packed his pickup with an arsenal of weapons that no person should ever want or need: An assault rifle. A handgun. A shotgun. A machete. Hundreds of rounds of ammunition.
Nicole Brodeur thinks banning the above is synonymous with "common sense gun-safety measures."

That means Nicole will tolerate no semiautos.

No handguns.

No shotguns.

No machetes.

And no ammunition--at least not "hundreds of rounds" (GASP! That many?)

Besides, why would you "ever want or need" them?

Nicole agrees with Chief Gil Kerlikowske that a 12-gauge is "not for hunting purposes, but for hunting people." (Funny--she didn't ask the chief about that evil semiautomatic service pistol he "lost" that is now out there "on the street"...)

I suppose if Huff had burned the place down, Nicole would want to implement "common sense match-safety measures."

"They were just kids," Nicole laments in righteous indignation.

Two of them were. I have yet to hear those like Nicole asking what the hell grown men in their 20's and 30's were doing partying with 14 and 15-year-old girls instead of protecting them.

Look at Nicole. She looks like she'd be a lot of help in a bind, doesn't she?

Listen to Nicole. She knows best. She's the expert.

Urban newspaper editorialists. Is there anything they don't know?

Hey Nicole: Molon Labe. What I told Sallie goes double for you.

4 comments:

Ben said...

What a self-righteous piece of crap. I'm embarrassed to say that she used to live in North Carolina.

Anonymous said...

My God, this stuff makes my stomach turn. I love the question:

"Why would someone want to buy an assault rifle?"

Because it's the last line of defense you ding bat! Did you happen to watch that hurricane that wrecked New Orleans last year?

E. David Quammen said...

I was just going to reference to the comment I posted to the 'Blame the Guns' posted above. But thought Nicole, might be drooling around the internet and happen upon this article. And the same meaning that applied to Jamison, most definately applies to Nicole. If not even more so:

"Believe the proper descriptive term for Jamison is "useful idiot".
Not to worry though. Once the powers that be seize power. The powers that be typically relieve themselves of the "useful idiot's".

Following this, the 'powers' then relieve themselves of those that helped support/enforce the use of perversity in gaining control. For you see, they are the next perceived threat to the 'power'. Absolute 'power' must control absolutely. Any threat to that power must be negated.

History is rife with examples. What is truly amazing. Is that the typical reign of tyranical 'power' is usually negated. And, in a great many instances, negated by very violent means.

Some people never learn."

However, I believe Nicole deserves further attention. For her cry is far more SHRILL. And she is a far more dangerous "useful idiot".

Nicole said, "Because in America, he could."

That is right Nicole, he could. And you know what else? Every other American, that is not in prison, was intended to as well.

Your solution is to 'Throw the baby out with the bathwater'. It is the creed of the lazy, weak and irresponsible. To advocate complete government 'protection' and control. Better known as a Totalitarian Regime. Which the principles, that are found in the United States Constitution, were designed to negate implementation of.

Absolute unchecked power, which is what Nicole suggests. Will cause the complete SUBJUGATION of the citizenry of America.

I would highly suggest that you take your 'binky' out of your mouth and grow up. If you desire to be a slave. Then move some place else! We do not need nor desire whining, drooling and irresponsible infants here in this country. (Unless they are in diapers and the appropriate

Now, more than ever before in our history. We need to secure and restore our Second Amendment Right.

To illustrate:

What if quite a few of the people in that house had been armed? (Like the Framers of the Constitution had intended?)
How amny shots do you think Huff would have been able to get off? How many people do you think would have died?

I can tell you one thing. Had I, or any number of other gun owners I know of, been there. Huff MAYBE would have just killed one. And then he would have been perforated, bagged, tagged and rolled away on a cart.

Pull your head out, Nicole!

You don't solve problems by undermining the United States Constitution. Or, negating the Security, which was the Intent of the Framers of the aforementioned document. And which they enumerated into place for us.

Look up the word 'Infringed', Nicole. I'm relatively sure you know what 'SHALL NOT' means. Any 'idiot', useful or not, should know the definition of the latter.

the pistolero said...

"I have yet to hear those like Nicole asking what the hell grown men in their 20's and 30's were doing partying with 14 and 15-year-old girls instead of protecting them."

My guess is that she would probably see that as being too judgmental, with all cultures (ex.: the "rave culture") and their customs being equal and equally valid, you see, except, of course, for that of us icky gun owners...
/sarcasm