Thursday, September 21, 2006

Racist Pricks!

[T]he only reason there's so much going on nowadays is b/c we have people like Floyd and straightarrow complaining about the tiniest things!
Anybody have experience with this troll Kim Spencer before?

If so, please tell the moron he (or she?) will have a better chance of getting read and responded to if he (or she) comments on current, as opposed to year-old posts.

I call attention to this stuff because it's just so damned funny listening to indignant airheads get all indignant and airheady.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh I've got to weigh in on this one!

Kim Spencer says SA is racist because Juan Hinojosa broke the law? What the hell?

I have just about had it with "racist" being the magic word that both makes a bad guy out of someone who identifies an egregious situation while it absolves the wrongdoers of responsibility.

SA did not mention ANYTHING about race, he was clearly speaking to the abuse of power and the blatant double standard that exists between how the "Only Ones" are treated regarding what is considered a firearms violation and how we plebs are treated for the same.

It's BS to yell Racist! I say debate someone on the merits of their argument or shut the hell up!

Man I'm steamed over this!

AlanDP said...

I'm disappointed. I've been ragging on this guy every chance I get for the past year and she didn't even notice me.

Anonymous said...

1894C, I appreciate the defense,and of course you are right as to the crux of my argument, but I don't think it will do any good.

Obviously this Kim Spencer is one stupid sonofabitch to not see the danger in special rules for special people. And his argument that racism is the genesis of expectations that the law apply equally to all, is in itself racist.

It sounds to me as though he is saying that certain races are incapable of obeying the law and behaving in a manner that is expected of their more disciplined brethren. Wonder which races he thinks those are. He didn't say. Though from his diatribe, I expect he meant anybody white that thinks the law should apply to all or none is a racist.

His refusal to allow for the possibility that brown, red, yellow or black men could be every bit as honest, upright and imbued with integrity as white men would seem to be to be the ultimate racist insult.

He did not allow for that possibility and he also made an assumption about my race(s), of which he knows nothing.

However, I encourage everyone to not take this seriously enough to get all angry and stressed out. Who knows he may lock his keys in his car and starve to death before somebody lets him out.

Anonymous said...

SA,

LOL! It's good you can keep your sense of humor.

The childish cries of racist, just drive me nuts.