Why don't we enforce the 20,000 gun laws currently on the books across the nation?Just like "we" did here?
I have a better idea.
Why don't we just enforce this?
Monday, October 16, 2006
"Enforce Existing Gun Laws"
I have a better idea.
Why don't we just enforce this?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
"Why don't we enforce the 20,000 gun laws currently on the books across the nation?"
Perhaps because they're illegal and perverse, maybe?
We don't even need the B.O.R.:
"A bill of rights is only an acknowledgment of the preëxisting claim to rights in the people. They belong to us as much as if they had been inserted in the Constitution."
- George Nicholas, June 16, 1788, The Debates in the Several State Conventions, (Virginia), on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. [Elliot's Debates, Volume 3].
"If the clause stands as it is now, it will take from the state legislatures what divine Providence has given to every individual--the means of self-defence. Unless it be moderated in some degree, it will ruin us, and introduce a standing army."
- George Mason, The Debates in the Several State Conventions,
(Virginia), June 14, 1788
Trial by jury cannot be considered as a natural right, but a right resulting from a social compact which regulates the action of the community, but is as essential to secure the liberty of the people as any one of the pre-existent rights of nature."
-James Madison, June 8, 1789 House of Representatives, Amendments to the Constitution
Post a Comment