This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I've been trying to establish, specifically, in what ways Zumbo is associated with the NRA. I'm told (but haven't found a way to verify) that he writes for their Shooting Illustrated magazine, and I know he's heavily involved with their Great American Hunters Tour.
Any specifics would be appreciated. I'd like to have all my ducks in a row before I get very heavily into arguing with the NRA.
He's been involved in the hunting tour--don't know what else--you're going to need to get a copy of the magazine to see if he's a featured writer. Do a "bleg" on Armedn and Safe asking for a current copy, and I'll link to it.
You could also just call/write/email NRA and ask them: 1. Does he have any affiliation with them? 2. If so, what is it? 3. And if so, do they intend to continue their affiliation or in any way publicly comment?
I've been trying to establish, specifically, in what ways Zumbo is associated with the NRA.
Use Zumbo's own words.
"I've been an NRA member for 40 years, have attended 8 national NRA conventions in the last 10 years, and I'm an advisory board member for the United States Sportsmen's Alliance which actively fights anti-hunters and animal rights groups for hunter's rights."
Zumbo's the one who "dragged" the NRA into the discussion. (At least for me). David was kind enough to point out that, gee, look at all the political capital we're wasting, why don't we go attack this problem (as I see it, and apparently he as well) at the source?
From the article currently at the top of the page:Yesterday, anyone who didn't comment risked being lumped in with anti-gun forces. Any voices calling for reason and tolerance found themselves shouted down. And those writers professing support for Mr. Zumbo privately certainly weren't willing to go on the record with that support..
Personally, I'd like to know a lot more about those writers. (And how many of them are NRA writers/muckity-mucks, as well?)
If ~6000 people felt the need to rip Zumbo a new one, and also let the NRA know that Hunting is not what the 2nd Amendment is about... We might get rid of some of those "Fudds" at the top.
After all, why did Zumbo use the NRA as deflection for his opinion?
5 comments:
I've been trying to establish, specifically, in what ways Zumbo is associated with the NRA. I'm told (but haven't found a way to verify) that he writes for their Shooting Illustrated magazine, and I know he's heavily involved with their Great American Hunters Tour.
Any specifics would be appreciated. I'd like to have all my ducks in a row before I get very heavily into arguing with the NRA.
Thanks
He's been involved in the hunting tour--don't know what else--you're going to need to get a copy of the magazine to see if he's a featured writer. Do a "bleg" on Armedn and Safe asking for a current copy, and I'll link to it.
You could also just call/write/email NRA and ask them:
1. Does he have any affiliation with them?
2. If so, what is it?
3. And if so, do they intend to continue their affiliation or in any way publicly comment?
I've been trying to establish, specifically, in what ways Zumbo is associated with the NRA.
Use Zumbo's own words.
"I've been an NRA member for 40 years, have attended 8 national NRA conventions in the last 10 years, and I'm an advisory board member for the United States Sportsmen's Alliance which actively fights anti-hunters and animal rights groups for hunter's rights."
Zumbo's the one who "dragged" the NRA into the discussion. (At least for me). David was kind enough to point out that, gee, look at all the political capital we're wasting, why don't we go attack this problem (as I see it, and apparently he as well) at the source?
From the article currently at the top of the page:Yesterday, anyone who didn't comment risked being lumped in with anti-gun forces. Any voices calling for reason and tolerance found themselves shouted down. And those writers professing support for Mr. Zumbo privately certainly weren't willing to go on the record with that support..
Personally, I'd like to know a lot more about those writers. (And how many of them are NRA writers/muckity-mucks, as well?)
Zumbo used the NRA as attempted cover for his attack on "Terrorist" guns. It's ground that's not unfamilar (as I linked to a lot last night. By the way, thanks a bunch for the Link!).
Jim Zumbo once asked me how many guns I owned, and I said I didn't know, but the answer was, "A lot." He said, "I've taken animals on every continents with 7 rifles."
If ~6000 people felt the need to rip Zumbo a new one, and also let the NRA know that Hunting is not what the 2nd Amendment is about... We might get rid of some of those "Fudds" at the top.
After all, why did Zumbo use the NRA as deflection for his opinion?
Not to mention NRA director Nugent as his minesweeper.
OK--thanks Unix-Jedi (and David). Those are good points.
I still like my idea of Zumbo going on a hunt not with Nugent, but with Dick Cheney after a few beers.
Post a Comment