Saturday, May 12, 2007

We're the Only Ones Avoiding Criminal Charges Enough

A police officer will avoid criminal charges despite admitting he took marijuana from criminal suspects and, with his wife, baked it into brownies.
This should infuriate on so many levels.

The whole damned War on Drugs has spawned all sorts of accepted police state tactics, from monitoring of financial transactions, to asset forfeiture, to no-knock home invasion raids...

Kathryn Johnston
was killed by the bastards who planted pot in her house. Donald Scott was killed by official thugs who openly planned seizing his land.

Cancer patients are being persecuted, their agony further compounded--even where the state allows medical marijuana because the feds will not.

And Dirty Sanchez here, and his sow of a wife, get brown-faced on some really good sh... and then get to waddle from the legal consequences?

A lot of you sent me this story--too many to credit, plus I'd already seen it on TV, but Dave Licht, as usual, had some particularly perceptive observations:
Have you heard the tape being played on national news of the cop that stole a suspects pot, cooked it into brownies and ate them, then called 911 asking for "emergency rescue" because "they were dead"?

The tape is funny on the surface but the media (and EVERYBODY) is missing the point astoundingly on this one; How often do cops in this department get away with stealing contraband or personal property from suspects? Does this department have a policy of shaking down suspects for personal gain? How many guns has this cop / this department / police EVERYWHERE stolen from citizens (to use as throwdowns or for the personal collection???) How often do suspects have contraband or personal property stolen by the police in departments EVERYWHERE? Are police in this country developing a certain quid pro quo with certain citizenry (like in Mexico) wherein police can rob and abuse citizens in exchange for not arresting them (or even if they do arrest them)?

I know this is not lost on you but the portrayal of this case and this tape being played on the national news as a joke misses the point entirely...and deliberately.
Yet we're told resistance is futile. We're warned against lifting a finger.

[More from "The Only Ones" files...]

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This also makes me wonder if there is any potential for litigating against these departments for civil rights violations.

I bet if you were to examine any department wherein an officer stole contraband, money, personal property you would find police theft and intimidation common in those departments and you would be able to advertise for "suspects" that had had their drugs, guns, money stolen. There should be a FULL COURT PRESS BY THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT, THE OFFICERS SHOULD BE FIRED & JAILED; THE CHIEFS / SHERIFFS SHOULD BE PROSECUTED AND THE DEPARTMENTS PLACED IN RECEIVERSHIP. THE COUNTY DA IN EACH COUNTY SHOULD BE REMOVED AND PROSECUTED FOR CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS.

I bet these police "ripoffs" are common and I do not want to live in mexico. I live in the U.S.A.

These police and police departments that are shakedown rackets should be prosecuted and closed. NO ONE should tolerate thes thieves and totalitarians on any level. This is a reasonable arena for WAR - NOW.

D Licht

Anonymous said...

One last PS -

Cops that take guns may be commiting murders -

Stories of cops keeping guns as throwdowns to use to justify shootings of unarmed suspects are so common that there must be something to it.

When derpartments are stealing guns and contraband - are they also killing unarmed suspects?

(We know they are!)

This is another area that should be investigeted nationwide by an independant counsel or private litigators.

We are loosing our freedom on so many levels that we should not tolerate the police becoming the sole arbitors of what they think is right ....... and we ought to stop allowing the police to investigate themselves. This is an intolerable conflict of interest that may be cutting the heart out of the freedom we expect in the U.S.

Thank you

D. Licht