While it is doubtful that the Supreme Court decision will contain a long list of specifics in terms of regulation, their opinion should convey the Court's opinion quite clearly and should be broad enough to cover a variety of scenarios.Liberty Belles discusses some in this new article by Jennifer Freeman...
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
A Variety of Scenarios
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
a nice well reasoned piece. Unfortunately one cannot reason a coward into courage or principle.
One can only make them declare their pragmatism (cowardice). Pragmatism being the word they choose as camouflage.
But wait, isn't she a coward or turncoat or traitor for not arguing for the elimination of NFA, GCA, and such?
I think you might be getting pragmatic in your old age!
Oops, forgot to log into the correct profile.
She didn't address them, which is a far better thing than saying "reasonable restrictions" on them is ok. Or did you just have a severe "Oh my God, that's me he described." moment.
She didn't concede anything as a quid pro quo bribe. Perhaps you can see the logic in that, or not.
the silence in deafening.
Post a Comment