Eleven months after a devastating massive tornado swept through Greensburg, KS—after which unidentified “authorities” acting under questionable instructions seized firearms from homes—the Kansas House of Representatives unanimously passed legislation that would make such gun confiscations illegal in the wake of such a disaster.What kind of control freak tinhorn tyrants would oppose this, and why should free men even tolerate them in our presence, let alone pay them and obey them?
Despite opposition from the Kansas Association of Chiefs of Police, the Pratt County sheriff and Kansas Bureau of Investigation...
[Via Jeffersonian]
7 comments:
I think you answered your own questions there.
All the outcry after the N.O. abductions and firearms thefts at gunpoint made no impression? Good to know.
They obviously think they're on the eventual winning side. I'm not sorry to disappoint them.
As in New Orleans, they were lucky this time. Strange priorities. Wrong priorities.
If and when I have to evacuate, family goes in the car first, guns second, anything else there's time for AFTER that. No confiscations allowed, even if they plan to return them later (after an NICS check, of course). I'm not afraid of a serious disagreement, either.
Just saw this: "guns were removed not only from wrecked homes but from homes that survived, even from secure cabinets and lockers."
And serial numbers recorded, I'm sure. What do they have in mind for the future?
This, in the heartland of America.
Tick tock.
The new law doesn't matter. NOPD said they'd do it again in spite of the law, and so will these clowns. Court decision against them? Feh! NOPD is up on contempt of court, and they just ignore it. They still haven't given up the firearms they stole under color of law. Nothing short of the people enforcing it with newly acqired guns will do it.
I guess the law needs to have a clause decriminalizing the killing of enforcers engaging in illegal gun confiscations.
Typical liberal mind set. If we lose a decision, they are the first to cry that the matter has be setteled in a court of law and we must respect that. However, when they are on the losing side, they cry, complain and then state they will not obey the court's decision. This tells you all you need to know about them.
Absolutely Kent. It is already legal to do so. It just isn't played by law. So you are right, it needs to be spelled out in black and white that it is the duty of Americans to stop thieves when and where they can, and should the thief be an agent of the government his agency will be held accountable for all bills of the citizen from that point forward, or in lieu, the head of the agency can elect to do twenty years hard time in a maximum security prison.
Think that would dampen their enthusiasm for committing and ordering crimes?
Post a Comment