The recent historic handgun ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court should have no impact on gun control and licensing provisions in New York state, a local judge has concluded.Then I'd say he's right in line with the "Vote Freedom First President's" administration...
[Via Jeffersonian]
4 comments:
"If they can set aside their laws when and as they wish, then that is absolutism, and I will not live under that yoke."
-- Colonial militia member, "The Last of the Mohicans," about the British.
"a complete ban on handguns is NOT per se unconstitutional, it all depends on how good a reason DC can prove for it."
That would mean... a right is a right until someone in authority makes a convincing argument that it isn't. ANY right.
Keep those cards, letters and votes coming if it makes you feel better. It gives them a good laugh. A happy tyrant may oppress a little less.
On the other hand, a New Jersey state appeals court has ruled that localities CANNOT make their own laws to prevent sex offenders from living near schools, parks and playgrounds.
We gun owners know where we rate.
Why anyone would still pretend to obey the "law" is beyond me.
Well Kent, I once had a cop tell me I couldn't obey the laws I agreed with and disobey the ones I don't.
My reply, "The Hell I can't, I've been doing it a long time,now."
Post a Comment