This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
They said it can't happen here, it happened anyway. If we did it to ourselves, I'm willing to undo it. But I don't believe we did it to ourselves, I believe we were lied to and decieved into doing it to ourselves. But whatever, yes or no, up or down, III.
Good song and I get his point. I also get the "What do you mean we,Kemosabe?". I think he means the collective sense of "We the People". All of us together, as in, we must all hang together for surely if we don't we will all hang separately kind of thing. If there are too many of us on one side of "we" or the other and we don't all stick to, or even know, the fundamental principles, then we're all screwed. The trouble is I don't think that there are enough of the "we" on our side of the principle to prevent a conflict that will be very unfortunate for all of us. It's a pity. Good song though, eh?
as it is with the non sequitur, "we owe it to ourselves," the two-part question remains, naturally, which group is the "we," and, which group is the "ourselves?"
This is actually a pretty brilliant example of propaganda. It's obviously aimed at the liberal left, with the use of "we" to disarm the hostile response that an "in your face" approach would get.
Also note the first half of the song lulls them into thinking it's about their favorite boogy-man, the Nazis, but then segues into a more modern situation, with the liberals and Jews being rounded up: the threat is to THEM, not to the right-wing types ....
Chris, I wouldn't be suprised at all. There's definitely a whole big bunch of "us". The problem is that there isn't a sufficient critical mass of "us" to avoid and/or remediate what is likely to come now that the political/social winds have shifted roughly 180 degrees. MVdB has it right, the GOP didn't protect us from the gun grabbers, the GOP protected the gun grabbers from us. The problem is that they (the GFW's) are too blind to see that and while they're all too rapturous of the shift at the moment, and they're all holding hands and singing Kumbaya, they are going to plow blindly along in their rapture, follow their hearts because it's for the children afterall, and they are going to move that line in the sand to a place where they never, in their wildest utopian dreams, ever imagined it would lead. The majority of "them" don't understand "us", they don't get fundamental principles, they are running on emotions and feelings, logic and reason (or even a sound grasp of history) aren't in their tool box, they have no idea of what the Law of Unintended Consequences is and they have no comprehension of the whirlwind that their actions will release in regards to messing with the RKBA. Bummer, dude. I'm pretty sure that we all have much better, more productive and more interesting things to do. Don't you?
9 comments:
They said it can't happen here, it happened anyway. If we did it to ourselves, I'm willing to undo it. But I don't believe we did it to ourselves, I believe we were lied to and decieved into doing it to ourselves. But whatever, yes or no, up or down, III.
Good song and I get his point. I also get the "What do you mean we,Kemosabe?". I think he means the collective sense of "We the People". All of us together, as in, we must all hang together for surely if we don't we will all hang separately kind of thing. If there are too many of us on one side of "we" or the other and we don't all stick to, or even know, the fundamental principles, then we're all screwed. The trouble is I don't think that there are enough of the "we" on our side of the principle to prevent a conflict that will be very unfortunate for all of us. It's a pity. Good song though, eh?
You might be suprised at how many "We" there are..
CIII
as it is with the non sequitur, "we owe it to ourselves," the two-part question remains, naturally, which group is the "we," and, which group is the "ourselves?"
The version I always heard was, "what's this 'we' shit, white man?"
Heh.
This is actually a pretty brilliant example of propaganda. It's obviously aimed at the liberal left, with the use of "we" to disarm the hostile response that an "in your face" approach would get.
Also note the first half of the song lulls them into thinking it's about their favorite boogy-man, the Nazis, but then segues into a more modern situation, with the liberals and Jews being rounded up:
the threat is to THEM, not to the right-wing types ....
A brilliant piece of work indeed.
He is VERY PRO RKBA, FWIW.
His song Me and My .30-06 is also good.
Chris, I wouldn't be suprised at all. There's definitely a whole big bunch of "us". The problem is that there isn't a sufficient critical mass of "us" to avoid and/or remediate what is likely to come now that the political/social winds have shifted roughly 180 degrees. MVdB has it right, the GOP didn't protect us from the gun grabbers, the GOP protected the gun grabbers from us. The problem is that they (the GFW's) are too blind to see that and while they're all too rapturous of the shift at the moment, and they're all holding hands and singing Kumbaya, they are going to plow blindly along in their rapture, follow their hearts because it's for the children afterall, and they are going to move that line in the sand to a place where they never, in their wildest utopian dreams, ever imagined it would lead. The majority of "them" don't understand "us", they don't get fundamental principles, they are running on emotions and feelings, logic and reason (or even a sound grasp of history) aren't in their tool box, they have no idea of what the Law of Unintended Consequences is and they have no comprehension of the whirlwind that their actions will release in regards to messing with the RKBA. Bummer, dude. I'm pretty sure that we all have much better, more productive and more interesting things to do. Don't you?
Post a Comment