As usual, the major players are all silent on voicing their position on the nominee. If past actions are any indication, they'll only enter into the controversy if dragged kicking and screaming by the grassroots, which generally means too late to change the outcome. Their apologists may point to the recent setback on Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court confirmation, and come up with all kinds of excuses why the realpolitik course is avoidance. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column notes that ultimately, the answer to the title question rests with us.
Here's what it boils down to: If you and I do nothing, and accept confirmation as inevitable without lifting a finger to stop it, no, he can't be.
If you and I do something that requires very little time and effort, and then urge every gun owner we know to follow suit, there could be a chance.
If you're just coming into this discussion, it would help to read Part One and Part Two.
Also, Jennifer Freeman of Liberty Belles gives us a language lesson.
Tell a friend? And take five minutes to contact a few people?
Have you read the latest from all the Gun Rights Examiners?
- Atlanta: Ed Stone
- Austin: Howard Nemerov
- Boston: Ron Bokleman
- Charlotte: Paul Valone
- Chicago: Don Gwinn
- Cleveland: Daniel White
- DC: Mike Stollenwerk
- Denver: Dan Bidstrup
- Grand Rapids: Skip Coryel
- Los Angeles: John Longenecker
- Minneapolis: John Pierce
- National: David Codrea
- Seattle: Dave Workman
- St. Louis: Kurt Hofmann
- Wisconsin: Gene German
No comments:
Post a Comment