The single mother, her daughter and teenage son, Anthony, had endured ten years of being virtual prisoners in their own home as a gang of up to 16 “street kids” tormented them for simply “existing”. [More]It's like the whole damn country is some sort of evil laboratory experiment designed to see what it takes to drive the test subjects into destroying themselves...
[Via Cousin G]
9 comments:
I'm sure the gang laughed at their weakness and passivity, only finally respecting them for one thing: having the guts to commit suicide. That's what we're up against: demons on Earth.
The city near me -- Richmond, VA (one of the newest Mayors Against Illegal Guns cities)-- is proud of having taken 100 guns "off the street" in its latest 4th-Amendment-flouting sweep. Do demons need guns?
Absolutely appalling.
It's like the whole damn country is some sort of evil laboratory experiment
I've actually wondered that myself, because the UK lacks all semblance of sanity and common sense and JUSTICE when it comes to crime, sentencing and the right of people to defend themselves. A sinister deliberate intent on behalf of the UK establishment is the only thing that makes sense when considering stories like this, and there are so many like this coming out from across the Atlantic.
It's really come to the point that it might be time to consider boycotts against the UK. The UK government and it's institutions obviously share no common standards of values and decency and respect for the individual, that we hold so dear in the USA. We snubbed the Soviets over "human rights" and more, maybe it's time to do the same with the NuLabour pondscum.
Freedom crumpets anyone?
The natives are getting restless
Sensationalist, maybe. But not beyond the realm of possibility. It's not like it hasn't happened many times before...
It is time for British subjects to start killing cops, taking the cop's guns, and asserting their rights. It is time for the British people to start hanging members of parliment from trees and lampposts. And it is time for freedom loving people everywhere to support them however we can.
clockwork orange baby, and you thought it was just dramatical fiction...
At least the son got the very best of dental care from the British Health Service.
sv
Kent has the right idea. When survival is on the line no one has the moral authority to prohibit its pursuit. If they try, they should be killed.
That is not harsh hyperbole, that is the only sensible response to murderers, assailants, and their accomplices, regardless of their positions or station.
"When survival is on the line no one has the moral authority to prohibit its pursuit. If they try, they should be killed."
There is more to that line of thought. When survival is not on the line, when someone steals half your income but it doesn't put you in danger of missing meals, the bulk of humans will not support you if you defend yourself as strongly as if you were starving. This is because those bulk of humans believe in Communist "need" as their morality, rather than property.
So if for practical tactical reasons you can only succeed at defending your property when you are starving, you are guaranteed to start starving before you act to change things. That's how we would predict that situation to work.
If you don't like the idea that starving is unavoidably in your future, then you should rethink your notions of proportionality in self-defense of theft.
I have no notions of proportionality of defense of theft. Theft is merely murder writ small, for it is the theft of that portion of one's life which was expended to gain that property. Therefore defense against theft is a matter of survival.
It matters not what the majority thinks of that stance. The few of that majority who rely upon that notion of "rightful theft through need" will not be happy with the consequences.
I most probably would not shoot someone who is trying to steal my car, unless I am in it, but I reserve the moral authority to do so.
Post a Comment