[B]ecause of a state law, the public is forbidden access to disciplinary actions against police officers. [More]"Only Ones" gone wild? None of your damn business.
A concealed carry data base?
The public has a right to know, by gum!
Any questions?
[Via Harvey]
3 comments:
David, this is NOTHING NEW.
The police profession attracts the worst of the worst of society to join its corrupt and terrorist ranks.
Murders, rapists, child molesters, sex offenders of every stripe, liars, perjurers, false reporters, thieves, wife beaters and the list is quite lengthy of the rotten ranks of law enforcement.
http://www.copwatch.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=108
http://www.copwatch.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=156
http://www.copwatch.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=125
http://www.copwatch.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?s=&forumid=126
It should be plain for all to see....
One law for YOU......another for BLUE.
This will NEVER change unless and until law enforcement officers, prosecutors, and judges are stripped of limited immunity, their personal assests, and retirement funds are made available for civil forfeiture via the civil litigation process.
The other change that MUST take place is charging law enforcement officers with the SAME crime and SAME prosecution as the average citizen.
All government employee matters should be handled in open meetings allowing citizen comment. After all we do pay their bloated salaries and diamond crusted benefits.
Sort of reminds me of their favorite question, "Why would you object if you have nothing to hide?"
Once asked that of a Utah state trooper when I demanded he strip so we could check his underwear for blood and fecal matter to see if he had been molesting small boys. Goddamn! He got mad, but I asked him the very same question he had just asked me, "Why would you object if you have nothing to hide?"
We did not part on friendly terms, but I figured Fuck him, feed him fish heads and rice.
Post a Comment