This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I wonder what would happen if duly elected delegates from each state met somewhere and decided to move the capital to Austin, Texas, form a new national government based on essentially the original U.S. Consititution and left those fatherless morons in D.C. scratching their heads? I was just wondering.
The bottom line is, we don't need their leadership, we don't need their bullshit and we don't need them period. Let's go around them just like McArthur did in the Pacific War and just let the whole damn thing starve to death.
“Twenty years ago, people who came to work in the federal government had better technology at work than at home,” said Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget.
LOL 20 years ago we still had 6 MHz 286 Zeniths at work. (Air Force) My roomie and I both had way better hardware at home.
The better alternative is to scale back the work so that it can be amply covered by the IT budget. It's not for profit (cough), so a larger budget is a greater expense and nothing more.
7 comments:
"Customer service?" I'm certainly not a "customer" of these bloated bureaucrats in any sense of the word.
The less efficient the murderous bastards are the better.
We need exactly the opposite of what the government junta member wants.
The federal government needs to be stripped of all computers.
We don't want efficient government, we want no government at all.
I wonder what would happen if duly elected delegates from each state met somewhere and decided to move the capital to Austin, Texas, form a new national government based on essentially the original U.S. Consititution and left those fatherless morons in D.C. scratching their heads? I was just wondering.
The bottom line is, we don't need their leadership, we don't need their bullshit and we don't need them period. Let's go around them just like McArthur did in the Pacific War and just let the whole damn thing starve to death.
“Twenty years ago, people who came to work in the federal government had better technology at work than at home,” said Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget.
LOL 20 years ago we still had 6 MHz 286 Zeniths at work. (Air Force) My roomie and I both had way better hardware at home.
Please....
The better alternative is to scale back the work so that it can be amply covered by the IT budget. It's not for profit (cough), so a larger budget is a greater expense and nothing more.
The problem is defective people in government and no technology known to man can compensate for that.
Post a Comment